One Seeker's Journey: A Positive Agenda - a letter to MoveOn.org    
 A Positive Agenda - a letter to MoveOn.org6 comments
20 Jan 2005 @ 19:55, by Craig Lang

I just sent this, along with a pretty sizeable $$$ contribution, to MoveOn.org. I think it pretty much sums up my view that we need to focus on light, rather than darkness.

==============================================

Hi Folks,

I just made a pretty sizeable donation to your "Don't get mad; get even" campaign. However, I noted that your agenda seems to be largely one of criticizing the Bush administration - a substantially negative one. I fully agree with everything you have said in that regard. However, I wonder if the campaign is more negative than would be optimal.

I believe that is one thing to criticize the current administration. Unfortunately, criticism doesn't attract as many people as we would need/like. Rather, it merely focuses attention on the party being criticized. And to a certain extent, in advertizing (which is what politics really is), any form of attention is good.

In my side-job as a hypnotist, I have learned that negativity is less effective than positivity. People want hope as well as anger. So, one thing that I think needs to be focused upon is the need for a positive agenda that provides hope to a dis-spirited nation. To make real inroads, the progress movement needs to provide a meaningful, realistic and progressive plan.

My wife is a conservative Republican (and an ardent Bush supporter), and so I hear alot of the criticism that these folks level against the progressives. And the biggest one is that the agenda is largely negative. In that I agree with her.

We need alternatives that the American people can embrace:
- How will we achieve peace?
- How are we going to save the environment?
- How can we spur the shift of our economy towards alternative/renewable energy sources?
- How can we begin to address the mass-inequities we currently see in the corporate world?
- etc...

Progressives need to offer a very solid, hopeful vision of the future, a "WE CAN..." attitude.
I believe that the need is to actually develop and promote a coherent, progrssive, solution agenda - one of hope for the future. We need to show that WE have a better idea - WE can help to solve the problems that the reactionaries are creating. We need to be the light of hope in the wilderness that will bring large numbers of people away from the conservative camp.

My $0.02.
Thanx,
-Craig Lang
craig@craigrlang.com

[< Back] [One Seeker's Journey]

Category:  


6 comments

20 Jan 2005 @ 20:08 by jstarrs : Good one, Craig...
...too much focusing on fear elsewhere.
Let us know what they reply, ok?  



20 Jan 2005 @ 21:31 by jmarc : A true example
of how to win friends and influence people. Good on you. Some of us are truly looking for an excuse to go to the other side of the aisle. You list a few that would work.  


21 Jan 2005 @ 07:04 by vaxen : Dichotomies:
Contrary to everything our rulers tell us, and everything that our schoolteachers are teaching the children of this nation, the biggest threat to the lives and well-being of the American people lies not with some foreign government. The biggest threat to the American people today lies with the United States government. And while gun ownership stands as a barrier to potential, Nazi-like behavior, the long-term solution is to dismantle, not reform, the iron fist of the welfare state and the controlled economy. This includes the end (not the reform) of the IRS, the DEA, the SEC, the FDA, the Departments of HUD, HHS, Labor, Agriculture, Energy, and every other agency that takes money from some and gives it to others or interferes with peaceful behavior. It entails the repeal of all laws that permit such conduct. And it means the privatization of most of the bureaucrats who work for the U.S. government.

But it also entails the end of potential oppressors who, in the past, have shown no reluctance to engage in evil, malicious, illegal, Nazi-like conduct against American citizens, such as the CIA and the standing army.

Would this mean that the U.S. government would not be permitted to act as the international Roman emperor? That is exactly what it would mean. But what about threats of invasion of the U.S.? Such threats are virtually nonexistent. But if every single citizen is free to arm himself to the teeth, any nation contemplating invasion would know that attacking the U.S. would be like swallowing a porcupine. What about a quick mobilization? There would be no reason why citizen-soldiers would not quickly mobilize in the event of an emergency. For example, suppose that the standing army is disbanded. The members of the 82nd Airborne Division would not simply disappear. They would become private, productive citizens, but ready in times of peril to answer the call. They could be, and probably would be more than willing to be, at any location in the country within 24 hours.

Moreover, there would be a doubly positive effect in terms of economic prosperity. No longer would taxes have to be sucked out of the pockets of private citizens to support the armed forces. And the members of the armed forces, now privatized, would now be economically productive members of society.

([link])  



29 Jan 2005 @ 20:59 by magical_melody : Good going Craig!
Positive action helps to heal the pain.

It must be really painful and challenging for you that your wife is 'an ardent Bush supporter' as you wrote above, given your stance and the pain you have shared in your recent log.

My experience is that the sacred space of our primary intimate relationship is where such pains often awaken and emerge so that they can be transformed in the combined fire of the deepening love that is present. I have discovered that the love shared between husband and wife committed to conscious relationship is the most powerful of all sacred spaces, and it offers the most potent environment where we can reveal and heal our deepest pains. Conscious relationship between a man and woman is a true sanctuary of the highest order and the highest of all initiations!

I wish you peace and happiness in your relationship and in your world!!

#####################
1/29/05 CL Note:
Thanx for the note, Alana.
Gwyn and I have simply agreed to focus on other stuff. As you say, the relationship is far more important and far too sacred to be blown apart by politics...
Take care and God Bless,
-Craig  



29 Jan 2005 @ 21:30 by craiglang : Another note
I still haven't gotten any reply from MoveOn.
They promise that all mail will be read by a human, but so far no acknowledgement.  



18 Mar 2006 @ 06:35 by Paul Gwin @68.224.129.24 : Dark days for Eisenhower Republicans
These are dark days for Eisenhower Republicans. This quiet ex-general from the heart of America had the United States leading the world on a healing path after WWII, building a higher civilization.
In the spirit of the People to People organization he fostered, we reached out to underdeveloped nations with educational and monitary aid, helping them catch up. Back then, nearly all Americans believed that people who have a decent level of living aren’t likely to war against each other. Under Ike’s leadership, the U.N., Marshal Plan, USAID, UNESCO, World Food Bank and many other peaceful innovations thrived. Through the U.S. Aid for International Development (AID) programs, business and industry were brought together to help countries modernize and build their economies. Agricultural businesses and the U.S. land grant universities joined together to found agricultural research, teaching and development institutions around the globe. The “Green Revolution” emerged from this and food shortages were virtually eliminated. Only politics, greed and poor distribution of the products of the world’s farmers stand in the way of feeding everyone.
At home, as among the temperamental generals in World War II, this gentle, behind-the-scenes worker, got some of the best minds of the nation working together to achieve common goals. They launched a network of Interstate Highways that brought prosperity wherever these beautiful roadways went. They expanded and improved national parks, forests, and monuments that brought pleasure to all who would use them and created new professions for those who would dedicate their lives to preserving them. Historians are just beginning to discover the unheralded intellect of Dwight D. Eisenhower. His colleagues even balanced the budget!
What irony, Republicans allowing a mediocre-minded scion of the Walker/Bush dynasty to take over the party and run our government in favor of a small clique of robber barons, disgracing our nation--and democracy itself--in the eyes of the world.  



Other entries in
3 Jan 2008 @ 15:50: What will/would the Awakening be like?
2 Oct 2007 @ 20:26: The Ark and The Grail - An evening of fascination and discernment
24 Jul 2006 @ 17:46: Aliens, Allies and Discernment
1 Jul 2006 @ 16:19: UFOs, Rainbows and Bare Earth
23 Jun 2006 @ 18:34: Response to Space.com 'Ten Alien Encounters Debunked'
18 Mar 2005 @ 19:12: More on Writing - fiction vs nonfiction
7 Mar 2005 @ 16:43: Prescient E.T. Contact SciFi
31 Jan 2005 @ 20:55: Another Spooky Connection?
21 Oct 2004 @ 00:05: For everything there there is a time
8 Oct 2004 @ 15:17: Enlightenment and Story Writing


[< Back] [One Seeker's Journey] [PermaLink]?