MUSE LOG: So...    
 So...2 comments
17 Apr 2003 @ 09:07, by Andy Lehman

For instance, this would be the archive... section 1 of Francis' three section dealy. Technical stuff, quotes from Nietzsche, etc. It could be any of the three... this is just the way my intuition would set it up.

[< Back] [MUSE LOG]

Category:  


2 comments

17 Apr 2003 @ 18:59 by shawa : $0.02
I think you´re making it too complicated.
The Newslog is a feature that is both an archive and an interface with readers.
To keep it alive, it must have a certain aspect which will appeal to readers.
Think of the cover of a book. Isn´t that what you would look at first, when you pick it up ? The cover actually sells the book.
On the other hand, don´t forget that it is possible to have the Room

a)closed to "outsiders" (to have a certain group intimacy, which in our Cauldron experience is inducive to relaxation, trust, and thus more spontaneity/that is : BB, Meeting, and Conversation only for Members)
but
b) the "showable/sharable" part (the actual writings) in a showcase (the Newslog) open to the Public and NCN members.
(What we want, I should think, is to SHARE these writings with a maximum of said NCN members, yes?)
The Newslog itself and its comments function is the most important feature of the workgroup, IF you want to communicate not only inside the workgroup itself, but with the larger community.

What I would do, is put the "art work" (the writings), with some atractive illustrations, in the Newslog, and only this. The category feature can be used to sort subjects out.
Maybe the Links section could be used to put references, not only URL bookmarks.  



18 Apr 2003 @ 08:01 by invictus : Okay...
Just trying to present as many options as I can think of. No problem. You know, it's a proven fact that I overcomplicate things... remember the elephant in the fridge ; )? Hee hee... anyway, I'd hesitate to have it closed in the long run, because that'd restrict involvement. Like Francis said somewhere else, it's something that people can come in and choose to get involved in. We want to share it with as many as possible, but we also want to make it easy to participate in; open. They're less likely to do that is it's closed. But the point is well taken. Wide open groups tend to degenerate, as we've seen in the past. I think it's best to tackle that question later, when we know a bit more about what shape the whole thing will have.

Yeah, I agree about the links. And we could include links to the categories (nice and bold and visible) in the front page description of the room (like I said in the planning room). Okay, news log for all three...  



Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
Subject:       
Comment:
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:


Other musings in
12 Jul 2004 @ 11:13: The Nameless
4 Jul 2004 @ 19:33: Moriae Encomium
14 Jun 2004 @ 09:43: Defying Gravity
7 Jun 2004 @ 18:15: The Stuff
25 May 2004 @ 10:51: Healing Israel/Palestine
28 Apr 2004 @ 12:14: Place Your Bid
3 Apr 2004 @ 17:08: The Hunted Sky
1 Apr 2004 @ 12:15: Orlando
21 Mar 2004 @ 17:55: Walking a Literary Labyrinth
17 Mar 2004 @ 16:54: Judariya


[< Back] [MUSE LOG] [PermaLink]?