31 Aug 2006 @ 18:48, by Bruce Kodish
Here is an interesting article by Carolyn Glick of The Jerusalem Post.
The source article can be found here: "Terrorist Theater Tricks"
Column One: Terrorist theater tricks
Caroline Glick, THE JERUSALEM POST Aug. 28, 2006
What are we seeing when we watch events from the Middle East on our
television screens? Is it news or is it terrorist theater?
Let us observe two media events which occurred on Sunday in Gaza. Sunday
afternoon released hostages and Fox News journalists Steven Centanni and
Olaf Wiig spoke before the cameras. The fact of their release and their
statements were reported by more than 1,000 news organizations throughout
the world.
At the press conference, Centanni and Wiig, who were forced by their
Palestinian captors to convert to Islam, praised the Palestinians.
Centanni said, "I just hope this never scares a single journalist away
from coming to Gaza to cover this story because the Palestinian people are
a very beautiful, kind-hearted and caring people that the world need[s] to
know more about." Wiig similarly praised the Palestinians.
While their remarks were covered extensively, no one seemed to think that
the fact that their first post-release statements were made at a
Palestinian Authority sponsored media extravaganza in Gaza was
significant. No one noted that the men were flanked by Palestinian
"security forces," and stood next to Hamas terrorist leader and
Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh.
No mention was made of the fact that the two were initially kidnapped by
just such PA "security officials," or that Haniyeh is one of the leaders
of one of the most fanatical jihadist organizations in the world, an
organization that the majority of the "beautiful, kind-hearted and caring"
Palestinians voted into office last January.
That is, no mention was made of the fact that until the two men left Gaza,
they remained unfree. No one asked whether they had been given the option
of not giving a press conference in Gaza. And now that they have spoken,
there can be little doubt that a second press conference by the two men,
in Israel or the US where no one will force them to convert to Judaism or
Christianity or threaten to kill them, will draw far less media interest.
After their press conference, the two men became yesterday's news.
Conveniently, the same day the PA released the men who its own forces had
kidnapped, Reuters reported that the IDF had shot a missile at its press
vehicle and wounded two cameramen - one from Reuters and one from Iranian
World TV network - while they were en route to a battle taking place
between IDF forces and Palestinian terrorists. Reuters, which is demanding
an independent investigation into the attack, is portraying its cameraman
Fadel Shana as an embattled hero who would do anything to bring the truth
to the world.
Yet it is unclear why anyone should believe either Shana or Reuters. Shana
told Reuters that as he was driving to the battle scene, "I suddenly saw
fire and the doors of the jeep flew open." He claims to have been wounded
by shrapnel in his hand and leg. These are minor injuries for someone
whose vehicle was just hit by a missile.
But then, the photographs taken of his vehicle after the purported missile
attack give no indication that the car was hit by anything. There is a
gash on the roof. The hood is bent out of shape. But nothing seems to have
been burned. Cars hit by missiles do not look like they have just been in
a nasty accident. Cars hit by missiles are destroyed.
Yet the glass on the windshield and the windows of Shana's vehicle isn't
even shattered. In the photographs taken of Shana on the way to the
hospital in Gaza, he lies on a stretcher, eyes closed, arm extended in
full pieta mode. He is not visibly bleeding although there are some blood
stains on his shirt, but then his undershirt is completely white.
I did not see these pictures in the media coverage of the purported IDF
attack on the Reuters and Iranian cameramen. I saw them on Powerlineblog
Web site. I did not see any questions raised from either the Israeli or
the international media on the veracity of Shana's tale, which of course,
provides a nice balance to the Centanni-Wiig hostage story.
AS IS the case with the Palestinian war against Israel, one of the most
notable aspects of Hizbullah's latest campaign against Israel has been the
active collaboration of news organizations and international NGO's in
Hizbullah's information war against Israel. Like their rogue state
sponsors, subversive sub-national groups like Hizbullah, Fatah and Hamas,
see information operations as an integral part of their war for the
annihilation of Israel and defeat of the West. And their information
operations are more advanced than any the world has seen. As becomes more
evident with each passing day, they have successfully corrupted both the
world media and the community of NGOs that purportedly operate in a
neutral manner in war zones.
It is not a coincidence that I saw the pictures of the Reuters' vehicle on
Powerline and not in the media coverage of the purported attack. Both the
global media and the international NGO community abjectly refuse to
investigate themselves. As democratic governments and their militaries
have proven incapable of dealing with the phenomenon (in part because they
seek to curry favor with the media and the international NGO community),
the blogosphere has taken upon itself the role of media watchdog.
BLOGGERS HAVE become a critical component of the free world's defense in
the current war. During the Hizbullah campaign in Lebanon, bloggers
scrutinized coverage of the war in a way that has never been done before.
Their work has exposed the dirty secret of the Middle East that the media
has hidden for so many years: The global media and the international NGO
community, which profess to be neutral observers, are in fact colluding
with terrorist organizations.
The blogosphere, and particularly Little Green Footballs, Powerline,
Zombietime, Michelle Malkin, and EU Referendum, have relentlessly exposed
the systematic staging of news events, fabrication of attacks against
relief workers, and doctoring of photographic images by Hizbullah with the
active assistance of international organizations and the global media.
The International Committee of the Red Cross, with its internationally
mandated status as a protected organization, is particularly culpable. The
blogoshere - and specifically EU Referendum and Zombietime Web sites -
have shown that Red Cross employees in Tyre and Kana fabricated from whole
cloth a tale of an Israeli airstrike against Red Cross ambulances in Kana
on July 23. In an exhaustively documented report, "How the Media
Legitimized an Anti-Israel Hoax and Changed the Course of a War,"
Zombietime showed how Red Cross employees took an old, rusty ambulance and
alleged that the IAF had attacked it with a missile that blew a hole
straight through the middle of the red cross on the ambulance's roof.
The Red Cross allegation was reported as fact by such "credible" news
organizations as Associated Press, Time magazine, the BBC, ITV, The New
York Times, The Guardian, The Age, MSNBC, The Los Angeles Times and the
Boston Globe. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch both published
accounts of the attack as evidence of Israeli "war crimes" in Lebanon.
Zombietime clearly proved from simple scrutiny of the photographs taken of
the ambulance, that the hole in the cross was not the result of a missile
attack but the work of the ambulance manufacturer. It was the hole for an
air vent. The pock marks on the roof were the result of age and decay.
There had been no fire in the ambulance. There was no attack. It was a
complete fabrication, concocted by Red Cross employees who enjoy their
protected status because their organization has pledged its neutral status
in this and all wars.
ONE WEEK later, as EU Referendum reports in a similarly detailed
investigation of the much condemned IAF bombing of Kana on July 30, (which
actually happened a mile north of Kana at Khuraybah village), Red Cross
relief workers actively participated in the staging of a perverted media
extravaganza where the bodies of dead children were paraded about before
the waiting camera crews for hours and hours.
Rather than demand that the ICRC account for the clear breach of its
binding commitment to neutrality, and rather than attack the Lebanese Red
Cross for its active collaboration with Hizbullah, the international media
has attacked the bloggers. They are brushed off as "Israel supporters,"
and "right-wing extremists." The aim of these brush-offs is to convince
"right thinking" citizens that they oughtn't have anything to do with
these champions of truth and human decency.
As each day passes, the governments, formal and informal legal
apparatuses, and media of free societies show themselves to be less and
less capable of contending with the information operations conducted
against their societies by subversive forces seeking their destruction.
As each day passes it becomes clear that the responsibility of protecting
our nations and societies from internal disintegration has passed to the
hands of individuals, often working alone, who refuse to accept the
degradation of their societies and so fight with the innovative tools of
liberty to protect our way of life. The vigilance of just a handful of
bloggers brought us the knowledge of the corruption of our media and the
network of global NGOs that we have come to rely on to tell us the
"objective" truth.
It is up to all citizens of the free world, who value our freedom to
recognize this corruption, applaud the bloggers and join them in refusing
to allow these corrupt institutions to cloud our commitment to freedom.
|
|
