|MEGATRENDS: Clearfield Doctrine|
15 comments3 Sep 2009 @ 17:17 by vaxen : Didn't...
think I'd get any nibbles with this one. And Obama will 'address' the nations students. Yeah, propaganda 101 and neuro linguistic programming the already horribly maimed via the bankster driven behavioral modification program known as American mis-education.
4 Sep 2009 @ 04:55 by a-d : You're right, Dear!...heheheh
I haven't...I tried...but never reached the end before I had to run... then back... repeat...too "heavy" to repeat... .... ahhh... I just need to give you (and your Fan Club) this link (with a smile & twinkle twinkle!...*!*) : [link]
4 Sep 2009 @ 16:52 by vaxen : Whoom...
and that link is just as heavy in another way. Great link, A-d, thanks a Terabyte for it. I tossed the above little byte of daruwyth in here for, well,uh, me...and for anyone who might chance upon this wayward venture.
5 Sep 2009 @ 07:12 by mortimer : inter resting
(I'm not a lawyer) they admit it’s a Corporation? you sure? Please, more data, I need more data. Have State Police become Corporate? How many Local Police are now corporate? Is the Sheriff still under Common Law? Does Common Law supersede Corporate Law?
Have you ever seen a Responsible Bureaucrat?
6 Sep 2009 @ 03:42 by vaxen : Here is...
A good place to start:
The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation!- by Lisa Guliani
There are a ton of links and research on this matter. But I just popped in here for a few moments. I have articles on it buried deeper in these Archives, too. As time alots I'll ship you some more urls. Thanks for reading the article mortimer san...
6 Sep 2009 @ 13:37 by mortimer : some notes
"US CODE: Title 28,3002. Definitions
(15) "United States" means —
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
"Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) interpreted the "judicial power" of Article III to establish the power of federal courts to consider or overturn any action of congress or of any state that conflicts with the constitution.
"United States v. Hudson and Goodwin, 11 U.S. 32 (1812). which decided that federal courts had no jurisdiction to define new common law crimes, and that there must always be a (constitutional) statute defining the offense and the penalty for it.
6 Sep 2009 @ 13:42 by mortimer : Sheriff is king
it appears to me that the Sheriff has more power than the federal. The IRS, DEA, etc any federal agency, can seize property only because the Sheriff allows it.
A PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE FOR THE OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF ~ National Sheriff’s Association booklet: The Role Of The Sheriff Past - Present - Future
"In conclusion, modern sheriff duties are performed by order of the people instead of by order of the King or Queen, so it is easy to see how the legal authority is politically oriented. Sheriffs can maneuver through court battles involving a challenge to their authority and come out successfully when they address the legal protections of their office concerning their constitutional obligations, and no legal system or authority in the United States can challenge it with any standing. As so, the sheriff and his deputies have retained their authority to arrest without a warrant for all crimes, however defined, committed in their presence, and for felonies not committed in their presence. These powers could not be truncated when the American legal system changed from common law to statutory law due to the verbiage of the Constitution, so the Sheriff exists as both an ancient and a modern authority.
6 Sep 2009 @ 19:12 by vaxen : Yes...
mortimer that would be true in America under the Constitution for the united States of America but under the UCC Commerce is king. Actually if the Sheriffs of this land would take back their power instead of accepting traitor gov's handouts they'd be free of Federal Restraints.
Some have... like Sheriff Mack over there in Arizona. Heh! The FED RES teet is too tempting for the corrupt not to suck. They're goin down a long and dark road and we're chasin em with torches and pitchforks. Thanks for the note and the comments...
In a few thousand years no one will care...
11 Sep 2009 @ 19:47 by vaxen : Congress lied?
Awww common! Congress? Lie? ;)
29 Jan 2010 @ 22:31 by TRT @188.8.131.52 : holder in due course
the States are holder in due course, they hold legal title to your intellect, evidenced by your birth certificate(you have equitable title)...also evidenced by them being able to license you your intellect back to you (for a fee!!) to drive a car, fish, cut hair, mix drinks, lawyerize, and so forth...all in the name of Public Safety...
26 Jan 2011 @ 20:29 by Marcus @184.108.40.206 : Illegal consideration (foreclosure)
First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Jerome Daly
in a foreclosure hearing the defendant needs to know to bring this issue up. Please share....
The banks did not give lawful money and the money they did give was created out of thin air... Not out of its reserves.
Yes, very few people will use this, but it is because the powers that be have suppressed it.
The bank did not use money from their reserves making it worse for the bank's case...
Daly won.... Kept his house....
Also see: Anheuser- Busch brewing v. Emma Mason
29 Apr 2011 @ 11:23 by abaldmaninaclueshirt @220.127.116.11 : clearfield doctrine
NO where in the Clearfield case does it say anything about the US government descending to a private citizen because it uses private credit. DEBUNKED
16 Jul 2011 @ 01:36 by Ace @18.104.22.168 : Re: First National Bank of Montgomery vs
The First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Jerome Daly is known as The Credit River Case. As a side note, the judge in that case was assassinated 6 months later.
27 Jul 2011 @ 19:01 by Kerry Fritz II @22.214.171.124 : UCC & The National/Inter-National Debts
The Holy Bible's Book of Proverbs speaks of a wise man discerning Time and Judgement - I had inherited ALLAH The NAMES of GOD in 1986. These were given in a dream. From that point on (as well as USN Storekeeper and other studies beforehand kept leading ME to search for more wise counsel. I found this mostly in books of old as welll as hints in conversations and false accusations of moral conduct attempted to be made into a crime. I was 'activated', 'ascended', 'raptured', etc. on March 17th, 2011 and when I saw the 'World' was not going to end (as Harold Camping preached that it would), then I knew I had to act fast.
I made MY Declaration of Faith and thus made MY calling and election sure/certain. After a local child-like Sheriff';s Deputy got angry because I told him I AM a Private Attorney General (who wa locked-up/went lame - I was requesting assistance as MY back injury and legs - I was instead of being taken to the hospital as per MY request - instead taken to jail overnight. Someone in assumed authority must have realized or were told that I was MY OWN BAIL BONDSMAN, and I was realeased the next morning, never having gotten anything to sleep on or cover with or a pillow for my head, nor given anything to drink as the arresting officer admitted and stated that I was probably dehydrated from having walked seven miles in the desert (before the arrest).
I AM now in a Negative Averment as to the one charge of harassing the Kern County CA Dipatch Operator of the Communications Center as well as a counter-claim against the CA Secretary of State, The Dept. of Treasury, and Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State. I own My own name and Stole The National Debt - I AM Ground Hog Land Lord Baron Bovrah Jehovah's Son II.
28 Jul 2012 @ 00:11 by Don Quixote @126.96.36.199 : not quite true ...
This is a very interesting argument but I am always pissed when these arguments are made with fraudulent quotes. The quote in the first paragraph ... alleged to be from the Clearfield case .... is simply NOT there.