Orgasmic Vancouver: Spirit & Science    
 Spirit & Science6 comments
24 Aug 2004 @ 21:47, by Robert Oveson


seeking absolute truths through perspective
needs where you're coming from and going to
and neither of these subjects are objective
especially when there is more than one view
a right or wrong but not both they conclude
to fit only one and they attempt to exclude
a spirit and reductionist alike misconstrue



[< Back] [Orgasmic Vancouver]

Category:  

6 comments

24 Aug 2004 @ 22:02 by nednednerb : er
in between these subjects
not quite stable thing is saved
demands appeased in willingness
and either of these objects are subjective
unless we share a view of each other
the wrong rights assumed as to at all conclude
to fit only one and then attempt to exclude
a spiritual reductionist finishes immediately...



I poemed that out after reading what you'd written. I think you're amazingly perceptive.  

25 Aug 2004 @ 00:57 by ov : M&M
Thanks Brenden. These things are kind of like do it yourself cross word puzzles, they all have the same structure and there is at least two different interpretations. They are usually condensations of other comments so most of the perception lies outside myself. Once you get enough of them inside your brain you will be able to swap lines, edit and transmogrify them into new messages, they're memetic lego, so let go and let's go.  

26 Aug 2004 @ 05:18 by skookum : I think they are great
I have pondered the one before this one... a bit... ponder ponder..hmmm.. still pondering.

the one before THAT one.. was very interesting...musing about that one currently.. as opposed to pondering  

26 Aug 2004 @ 07:15 by ov : Thank you
I will have to get busy and write some more. They are better when they are fresh and the source is still in everybodies mind. Most of these are a couple of years old which is when I settled into this signature style. A couple of months ago I discovered that it is a variation of the rhyme royal introduced by Geoffrey Chaucer, but James first who became sixth and patron of the King James version of the Bible used it as well and probably gave the name, and Spenser adapted it. Neither of them were as anal-retentive as I can get and they didn't have the monospace type that lines up the edges so straight. I didn't know all this at the time, I just kind of liked them like that.  

27 Aug 2004 @ 03:09 by skookum : I wrote a new one
it is below the duck one.. not sure why.. but I wrote it.. posted it..

must be for someone... odd thing that  

27 Aug 2004 @ 03:30 by ov : I saw that
but wasn't sure who.  

Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
Subject:       
Comment:
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:

Other entries in
22 Dec 2004 @ 20:39: An Alter Ant
14 Sep 2004 @ 18:56: Compassion For The Camel
2 Sep 2004 @ 17:12: Dick 'N Kenny
30 Aug 2004 @ 19:21: It's Politics By God
22 Aug 2004 @ 22:57: Important Choices
19 Aug 2004 @ 17:18: Who Knows Who
18 Aug 2004 @ 17:29: All Right In Middle East
1 Aug 2004 @ 00:16: Byron's Sennacherib
27 Jun 2004 @ 01:37: Poems For Debra
14 Jun 2004 @ 12:10: Chains of Gold

[< Back] [Orgasmic Vancouver] [PermaLink]?  [TrackBack]?