| Beautiful Lies, Ugly Truths and the Answer to an Age-Old Paradox | 3 comments |
|
9 Aug 2007 @ 14:44, by Trent Crace
Many people seem to be quite miserable on this planet, some more than others. Yet an interesting and for some a surprising feature of this misery is that when thoroughly examined, it seems it’s there because people want it to be there. People want to feel bad. This is quite obviously insane but as with any insanity, there is order to it, there is a noble spiritual goal in its midst. Gurdjieff commented on this seemingly strange state affairs when he said that man will give up his pleasure long before he’ll give up his pain. His contention was that perhaps this results from man’s desire to be noble. His explanation may be a specific instantiation of a more general truth: people want to be miserable because it’s beautiful. Aesthetics may answer the question of why people are seemingly drawn to pain, confusion, helplessness and failure.
I can remember being in class in college and announcing to the students around me that I had discovered the answer to the age-old paradox, the one that asks how God can create a rock He cannot lift. (For those of you unfamiliar with the paradox, if God can create a rock that He cannot lift, well, then He cannot lift it and He is thus not omnipotent. If God cannot create the rock, then He is obviously not omnipotent. This paradox presupposes that for God to be God, He must be omnipotent). My answer was that He could do it through a lie. He could create the rock, knowing full well that He is able to lift it. Then, He could “forget” or make Himself unconscious. He could somehow, through some mechanism, repress this knowledge. Outraged, the other students around me claimed that I had not solved the paradox because the ultimate result is that God is unable to lift the rock and is thus no longer omnipotent. False. He can lift the rock, He is still omnipotent but He can’t because He has chosen to forget or repress his ability. If God is omnipotent, He must also be completely free, free to choose whether or not to lift the rock.
This paradox is really a question of how a God may become a creation or how a God may become human. In “The Phoenix Lectures,” Hubbard describes just how this change may occur. He says it comes about through altering one’s creation. Yet simply practicing what he refers to as alter-isness does not necessarily cause one to lose control of one’s creation. It’s in altering a creation to the point that one’s role in the creative process goes out view that can make a God into a man. Hubbard discussed at length what he called The Legend of the Creator: persistence is created when a being alters a creation by postulating that it was in fact created by someone else. Such an action, making someone other than oneself responsible for one’s creations, brings about persistence as well as a plethora of experience that must be inherently foreign to a being with endless potential creative power. Weakness, desperation, helplessness, anguish, really a whole host of experiences and sensations become available to a being when it loses control over creation. It’s quite possible that this may explain why beings are ‘down here’ in the first place.
In his essay, “The Subtle Choking-Chains of Aesthetics,” Max Sandor suggests it is through the use of aesthetics, as an alter-isness of creation, that can make a god into a man. He writes: “How can an almighty Being with limitless potential degrade to a completely other-determined entity? The only way, it seems, was the voluntary attribution of an aesthetic to a 'lower' state of sensation.” Sandor is answering the paradox in the same way that I did above, except his answer is more specific. I said it could happen through a lie. He said that lie is aesthetics. He goes on to explain that when a being introduces or injects aesthetics into an event, terminal, phenomenon etc., this introduces high-frequency energy. Ultimately, this introduction obscures the so-called truth of the phenomenon and if one cannot see the truth of it, one certainly will not be able to control it. One ends up with a beautiful mystery, which may describe what life looks like to most inhabitants on this planet.
Spirits seem to have an innate attraction to beauty. They love it. When a being makes things like pain, loss, failure and misery beautiful, it has set quite the trap for oneself. When it introduces this high-frequency energy (aesthetics) into an event or terminal, it can no longer see how it may have created this event or terminal in the first place. The result is persistence of that particular condition. In the end, this means that an important step in restoring one’s power is developing the willingness to see life as less than beautiful.
As an example, I had a friend who according to my perception, had clearly become a weak, selfish and emotionally manipulative person due to decisions he had made in his childhood. Yet I can remember as I described the less-than-ideal conditions of my own childhood, he said to me, “I never had that experience. My parents were great. I had no problems.” In other words, he is telling me that he had a beautiful childhood. In my own life, I’ve noticed that in a recent break-up with my girlfriend, I was experiencing feelings of loss and longing. They were quite powerful, even paralyzing at times. Concurrently, these feelings were quite beautiful to me, stuff of which a million love songs have been written. When I ‘spotted’ the aesthetics in these feelings, the fact that I was creating them and desiring them would naturally come into view. Most of the time, I would choose to divorce these feelings from the aesthetics and the magnitude of the feelings would drop to almost nothing. Sometimes though I left the aesthetics there and simply enjoyed the beautiful sadness.
Standing behind the pursuit of truth and beauty (or lack thereof) is an inappropriate identification of certain goals with others. The average person seems to fear the truth as they fear it will destroy their beautiful life. They see the only way to create a beautiful life is through beautiful lies. They do not want to analyze the reality of their relationship with their spouse or the genuine intentions of their governments or their placement here in the physical universe because as they have charged these things with aesthetics, they naturally don’t want to see their work of art desecrated. The truth is that truth is destructive, but to build something with true foundation, one has to clear out any substandard structures first. So it seems that the ability to create beautiful truth is a sign of real spiritual maturity.
* Go to [link] for a great drill to get one in touch with one's use of aesthetics
|
|
Category: Philosophy
3 comments
29 Aug 2007 @ 03:57 by a-d : Seems to me as if...
... there's a shift going on in this particular realm -as in so many other areas of Life: People are tired of being bamboozled into feeling guilty for someone else's evil and are even more tired of being made to remain loyal to those evils -"or else".... all under the smokescreen of the "enobling" suffering/pain-BS put forth by the Crook's via their CHURCH/es!... People today are ready to see through the "Blaiming the Victim"-Charade and not willing any longer to take on that yoke of emotional crippling!
Has anybody else noticed this?
29 Aug 2007 @ 18:06 by solomoreno : A shift?
It seems to me that my generation (I am twenty-three) is able to better recognize truth than others. It's difficult for me to ascertain whether this is just a characteristic of youth or whether there is something special about my generation. It could have something to do with the almost total breakdown of the family unit which causes people to be what's called "ego-distonic." In other words, their egos are rooted in their anima/animus, not their bodies. This affords them viewpoints that your normal, run-of-the-mill earthling doesn't regularly access (supposedly until later in life).
As far as this "blaming the victim"-Charade, it seems that people they either blame the victim or blame the perpetrator, both viewpoints preventing any opportunity for growth. It's no mistake that Geoffrey Filbert listed Innocence as man's third worst enemy (after drugs and self-pity). Nietzsche should be standard reading in every classroom in the country.
31 Aug 2007 @ 04:32 by a-d : Blaiming the Perpetrator!?!
how do you do that????.... And to let justice have its day IS growth!
"It IS easier in todays world to have a voice for your truth; on your own web-site , for instance, or in a chat room.... but as far as the ability to feel truth resonate within you, I think is a Divine Gift -and has always been part of the Cosmic Make Up in the Cosmic Being called Human, just like Intuition, Inspiration, Instinct etc.
"The shift" is the fact that today people , who just thirty years ago, would not have broken loose and away from their "Cirles" actually do so today -in ever bigger numbers! PUBLICITY has made space for this to occur.
(the Good Die Young" was faaar tooo much implemented in "Earlier Days", on those guys who dared to try! Sure.... Good People still "Die Young", but not necessarily the ones who brake away from their Groups, but over all Whistle blowers, Dissidents and such )
Other entries in Philosophy
3 Mar 2008 @ 12:50: Taoism and Confucianism : Part II
22 Feb 2008 @ 09:33: Edward Carpenter, Gandhi and the Politics of Identity
27 Jan 2008 @ 09:37: On Creating and Resolving Contradictions on the ChessBoard: Part I
7 Jan 2008 @ 09:41: On the Dual Nature of the Universe Part II
30 Dec 2007 @ 09:43: On The Dual Nature of the Universe Part 1
17 Dec 2007 @ 09:59: Superconsciousness
13 Sep 2007 @ 20:48: "Shadows in the Dark" or "Enlightenment - virtue or crime, blessing or curse"?
15 Aug 2007 @ 17:17: Our world as a simulation
11 May 2007 @ 18:44: All Religious Writings (Bible, Koran, etc.)
1 May 2007 @ 16:35: Eureka!
|