|
|
 22 Sep 2005 @ 00:17
It is there for all to see. Agenda clear, no matter how the tragedy is unfolding we are here to profit ourselves and our friends who support us. We may appear to turn our backs on our own BUT they will do fine behind the scenes. And be very sure that at every turn we will hesitate only as long as we mustto determin that our profits and interest will be taken care of. A Brown Root has a contorted tree that it feeds, you can be very sure of that.
One needs to be very blind not to recognise a naked emporer strutting his stuff. Shakespeare had it though and we all have our en-trances and our exits, it is how we strut our stuff in the moment that matters in the grand unfolding comic drama.
Read more of the 'dirty deeds done dirt cheap' the changes are rockin' and arollin' in Trad Jazz land!! More >
|
|
|
|
17 Mar 2002 @ 03:02
Subject: 9-11: The Flight Of The Bumble Planes > > 9-11: The Flight Of The Bumble Planes > > by Snake Plissken > as told to Carol A. Valentine > Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum > http:www.Public-Action.com > Copyright, March 2002 > May be reproduced for non-commercial purposes > See [link] > To hear the bumble planes, visit above URL > > March 10, 2002 -- Eureka! One of my readers, who calls himself > "Snake Plissken," has put it together. He tells us why the passenger > lists of the four September 11 "suicide" jets were so small, how > remote control was used, why the transponders were turned off, why > the radar tracks of the four planes were confused, why there was no > Boeing 757 debris at the Pentagon ... > > By George, I think he's got it! > > My e-mail exchanges with Snake took place over a series of days. > With Snake's agreement, I have consolidated the exchanges, inserted > some reference URLs, and made minor edits. My comments and additions > will be bracketed thus [ ]. As you read what Snake has to say, keep > the following in mind: > > "Magic is the pretended performance of those things which cannot be > done. The success of a magician's simulation of doing the impossible > depends upon misleading the minds of his audiences. This, in the > main, is done by adding, to a performance, details of which the > spectators are unaware, and leaving out others which they believe you > have not left out. In short a performance of magic is largely a > demonstration of the universal reliability of certain facts of > psychology." (John Mulholland, "The Art of Illusion," Charles > Scribner & Sons, 1944.) > > In what follows, Snake unravels the illusions of the 9-11 magicians. > > === > > Carol, > > You did some fine research on 9-11. You came within inches of > solving the puzzle of the "suicide" jets, and now you need the rest > of the story. Let me explain by making a suggestion. > > Go visit a bumblebee hive some time, and try to keep your eye on just > one bee. You can't do it. You get confused. Think of the 9-11 > jets as bumblebees. Matter of fact, you could even call Operation > 911 "Flight of the Bumble Planes." > > I've worked in cryptology and there are many ways of hiding the > truth. Substitute information, omit information, scramble the > information out of sequence, and add nonsense (random garbage). All > four methods were used on the 9-11 incident. Let me lay out the > clues and show you where they lead. > > THE CLUES > > * First Clue -- Few Passengers On The Four Flights: Many have > remarked about the short passenger lists on the four 911 jets. You > might get a low turnout for a 767 or 757 now and then, but four > coast-to-coast flights taking off from the East inside of a few > minutes of each other, all with short passenger lists? Nuts. That's > your first clue. > > * Second Clue -- First Report of First WTC Crash: The second clue > comes from the first New York eyewitness on NBC. She had no question > about what she saw. You could hear it in her voice. If she was the > state's witness, the defense team would have their heads between > their knees before she stopped talking. > > What did she say? She heard an airplane coming in low and looked up. > She saw a small private jet, and watched it fly into the first WTC > tower, the North tower. She was certain in her description -- most > people know the difference between a big round-nose commercial jet > and a smaller plane. > > [ CV cmments: > [ In his testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on > October 25, 2001, NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart said of the first > September 11 report: "We were told it was a light commuter airplane. > It didn't look like that was caused by a light commuter airplane." > [ [link] > [ [link] ] > > Later, some dodgy report came in from an anonymous source in the > "United Airlines Command Center" that American Airlines had a > hijacking, and they gradually padded the story out until the viewer > felt like he was part of an unfolding revelation on the size and make > of the plane. So the first eyewitness's story got shellacked. > > * Third clue -- Pentagon Crash: The first report on NBC said there > had been an explosion near the Pentagon heliport. No mention of a > plane. > > If you were watching ABC, the first reports cited eyewitnesses who > said a business jet had crashed into the Pentagon. Notice that this > description is similar to the first report about the WTC. A small > plane, not a big, round nosed passenger jet. > > Then ABC interviewed some media executive who said he "saw the whole > thing" from his car on the freeway. It was an American Airlines > passenger jet. Good luck the road didn't need his attention while he > was gawking. And of course it was a big passenger jet scraping the > light poles with it's belly as it came in low. And that story paved > the way for the official truth. > > * Fourth Clue -- No Boeing 757 Debris at Pentagon Crash Site. By now > lots of people have realized there is something very wrong with the > story of Flight 77's crash into the Pentagon. What's the problem? > The wingspan of a 757 is about 125 feet, with about 35 feet between > the two jet engines. > > [ [link] > [ [link] > > The hole left by whatever hit the building was 70 feet across. > > [ US News & World Report, December 10, 2001, pg. 31 > [ [link] > > After the smoke died down, everyone could see the Pentagon but no one > could see the plane. The Pentagon is made of masonry -- limestone -- > not steel and glass. The aluminum wings of the plane should have > been ripped off and left outside the building. We should have seen > wing wreckage. But there was none. > > [ CV comments: > [ I have studied TV footage taken contemporaneously by various > networks and reviewed photos from news magazines published just after > 9-11. After the smoke died down, no Boeing 757 debris was visible. > > [ See the following URLs at the website of the U.S. Army Military > District of Washington, D.C., sent to me by researcher John DiNardo, > . By the way, Mr. DiNardo suspects that > inside explosives were used at the Pentagon on 9-11. Certainly the > damaged section of the building had just been renovated; explosives > would have been easy to install. ] > > [ [link] > [ [link] > > [ [link] > [ [link] > > [ [link] damaged.html > [ [link] ] > > [The scenes depicted by the US Army photos are consistent with > contemporaneously published photos in the popular press. See, for > example, US News and World Report, September 14, 2001, pg. 40. > > [ [link] > [ and the photo that appeared in Newsweek's 2001 "Extra" edition, pgs. 26, 27. > [ [link] > > [ This photograph below, with caption, appeared on the US Army > Military District of Washington site. It unwittingly demonstrates > that there was no Boeing 757 wreckage. Think now: a hundred thousand > pounds of seats, framework, skin plates, engine parts, flaps, wheels, > luggage, interior panels, electronics, and this little out-of-context > scrap of God-knows what was shown by the Pentagon. > [link] > [link] > > [ In the last several months, largely as a result of Mr. DiNardo's > work, there has been growing Internet discussion of the lack of > Boeing 757 debris outside the Pentagon. Now, magically, new photos > of "Boeing 757" Pentagon wreckage are beginning to appear. Check out > the websites of Mike Rivero and Joe Vialls > for copies of these fakes. Rivero and Vialls, by endorsing them as > real, have surely identified themselves as members of the fake > opposition. > > [ OK. Now back to Snake Plissken] > > * Fifth Clue -- Quality of Pilots in Pentagon crash: As you point out > > [ Operation 911: NO SUICIDE PILOTS, [link] > action.com/911/robotplane.html ] > > the flying instructors who trained the "suicide" pilots of Flight 77 > said they were hopeless. "It was like they had hardly even ever > driven a car ..." The flight instructors called the two, "dumb and > dumber," and told them to quit taking lessons. > > Yet the Washington Post described the maneuvers of Flight 77 before > it hit the Pentagon. The huge jet took a 270 degree hairpin turn to > make its target. The Post said Flight 77 had to be flown by expert > pilots. > > Something is wrong here. Now "dumb and dumber" are expert pilots. > That is your fifth clue. > > * Sixth Clue -- Transponders Turned Off: As you point out, the > "hijackers" turned off the transponders which transmit information > showing the airline names, flight numbers, and altitude. But the FAA > also uses conventional radar, so the "hijackers" must have known the > planes were still visible. Why would the "hijackers" shut the > transponders off, you asked? You are looking at your sixth clue. > > ["Did NORAD Send The 'Suicide' Jets?" Part 1 > [ [link] ] > > * Seventh Clue -- Confusion On Radar Tracks: As you point out, some > of these flights disappeared from the conventional radar scopes. > [See above-cited URL.] That's your seventh clue. > > * Eighth Clue -- Second WTC Tower Barely Hit: Have a look at the > footage of the second WTC tower being hit. The plane almost missed > the tower and just managed to hit the corner. Yet the first plane > struck its target dead center. That's your eighth clue. > > [ See diagrams from Wag the WTC website at: > [ [link] Action.com/911/psyopnews/Extra/1/southtowerpath.jpg > > HERE'S WHAT HAPPENED > > * A Boeing 767 was secured and painted up to look like a United > Airlines jet. It had remote controls installed in it, courtesy of > some NORAD types. Call that plane "Pseudo Flight 175" and leave it > parked at a military airfield for the moment. > > * The number of the passengers on each flight was kept artificially > low that day. Easy to do. Just monkey with the airline computers > and show the fights full so no more tickets are sold. Include some > of your own operatives in each flight, maybe. > > * After the planes are in the air, the transponders must be shut > down. There are a few ways to do this, maybe, but the simplest is > this: Have one of the NORAD insiders call the pilots and say: "This > is the North American Aerospace Defense Command. There is a national > emergency. We are under terrorist attack. Turn off your > transponders. Maintain radio silence. Here is your new flight plan. > You will land at [name] military air base." > > * The pilots turn off the transponders. The FAA weenies lose the > information which identifies the airline, the flight number, and the > altitude of the planes. Of course the planes can still be seen on > conventional radar, but the planes are just nameless blips now. > > * What did the radar show of the planes' flight paths? We'll never > see the real records, for sure. But in the spy movies, when the spy > wants to lose a tail, he gets a double to lead the tail one way while > the spy goes the other. If I were designing Operation 911, I'd do > that: As each of the original jets is flying, another jet is sent to > fly just above or below it, at the same latitude and longitude. The > blips of the two planes merge on the radar scopes. Alternately, a > plane is sent to cross the flight path of the original plane. Again, > the blips merge, just like the little bees you're watching outside > the hive. The original planes proceed to the military airfield and > air traffic control is thoroughly confused, watching the wrong blips > ... > > That's probably close to the way it was managed. Like I say, we'll > never see the radar records so we won't know exactly. > > [ For the alleged flight paths of the four jets, see > [ [link] > [ For names and locations of military airfields in the US, try > [ [link] > [ You can search for a listing of bases in 9-11 related states by > using the search engine.] > > * A small remote controlled commuter jet filled with > incendiaries/explosives -- a cruise missile, if you like -- is flown > into the first WTC tower. That's the plane the first NBC eyewitness > saw. > > * The remote controlled "Pseudo Flight 175," decked out to look like > a United airlines passenger jet, is sent aloft and flown by remote > control - without passengers -- and crashed into the second tower. > Beautiful! Everyone has pictures of that. > > Why did Pseudo Flight 175 almost miss the second tower? Because the > remote operators were used to smaller, more maneuverable craft, not a > big stubborn passenger jet. The operators brought the jet in on a > tight circle and almost blew it because those jets do hairpin turns > like the Queen Mary. They brought it in too fast and too close to do > the job right and just hit the corner of the tower. > > * Then another remote controlled commuter jet filled with > incendiaries/explosives -- a cruise missile if you like -- hits the > Pentagon, in the name of Flight 77. > > * Eyewitnesses are a dime a dozen. Trusted media whores "witness" > the Pentagon hit and claim it was an American Airlines Boeing 757, > Flight 77. Reporters lie better than lawyers. > > * Meanwhile, the passengers from Flights 11, 175, and 77, now at the > military airfield, are loaded onto Flight 93. If you've put some of > your own agents aboard, they stay on the ground, of course. > > * Flight 93 is taken aloft. > > * Flight 93 is shot down or bombed -- makes no difference which. > Main deal is to destroy that human meat without questions. Easiest > way to dispose of 15,000 lbs. of human flesh, and nobody gets a > headline if they find a foot in their front garden. No mass graves > will ever be discovered, either. > > * The trail is further confused by issuing reports that Flight 77 was > actually headed towards the White House but changed its course. > > * The trail is further confused by having The Washington Post wax > lyrical about the flying skills of non-existent pilots on a > non-existence plane (Flight 77). > > * The trail is further confused with conflicting reports and > artificial catfight issues, such as -- did The Presidential Shrub > really see the first tower hit on TV while he was waiting to read the > story about the pet goat ... > > So we know the Boeing that used to be Flight 93 was blown up. The > other three original Boeings (Flights 11, 175, 77) still exist > somewhere, unless they were cut up for scrap. > > The passengers and crews of Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93 died in an > airplane crash, just like the newspapers said. Only for most of > them, it was the wrong crash. But that's as close to the truth as > the news media likes to get anyway, so it works. > > WHY DO IT THAT WAY? > > So there you have it. Not four planes. More than fourJî
|
|
|
|
10 Mar 2002 @ 03:30
Dick Eastman
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:36:28 -0800
From: "Dick Eastman" - eastman@compwrx.com
To: "VICE PRESIDENT OF U.S." - vice.president@whitehouse.gov
I've been thinking, based on all the images in the French site,
[link] ,
that there probably only three crashbomb airliners in the frame-up plan;
that the plane that went down in Ohio was the only plane
meant for the Pentagon, the only one meant for Washington D.C.;
and when it failed to get there (there are compeating plausible
theories why it did not reach its target -- they are irrelevant to this
point) the managers of the frame-up operation chose to set off
the the planted charges to blow up the targeted section of the
Pentagon (pro-sovereignty Naval Intelligence, maybe?) not wanting
the unused planted charges to be discovered and used as evidence
of a conspiracy -- the frame-up planner/managers knowing that with
Wolfowitzand Rumsfeld in charge of a building and surroundings that
are usually top secret and with witnesses reasonalbe
probability of success in the deception (especially when they can
count on their control of the major media monopoly and national-
security powers -- not to mention psy-ops capability -- -- to bluff on
the airly tale existence of a "fourth" hijacked aircraft.
This would mean that a recent story of a D.C. gas station security
camera capturing the plane crash -- which no one has seen
-- is part of the disinformation bluff -- certainly the CIA would
have a presence or a capability at a strategically placed gas
station across the street from the Pentagon ! -- the lie
about confiscated video footage being disinformation
to anchor the false idea that "A tape exists it has been
confiscated and is not being released, isn't that a shame etc.)
If all this is true
This would mean that the establishment are bunglers -- as
we would expect from spoiled rich kids who hire Kissinger and
Brzezinski and think they are getting brains. == And thisA TIMELINE SURROUNDING
SEPTEMBER 11TH - IF CIAAND THE GOVERNMENT WEREN'T INVOLVED IN THE SEPTEMBER 11
ATTACKS WHAT WERE THEY DOING?
Bin Laden Met with the CIA in July and Walked Away
by Michael C. Ruppert (see his www.copvcia.com) FTW, November 2, 2001 -
1200 PST -- On October 31, the French daily Le
Figaro dropped a bombshell. While in a Dubai hospital receiving
treatment for a chronic kidney infection last July, Osama bin Laden met
with a top CIA official - presumably the Chief of Station. The meeting,
held in bin Laden's private suite, took place at the American hospital
in Dubai at a time when he was a wanted fugitive for the bombings of two
U.S. embassies and this year's attack on the U.S.S. Cole. Bin Laden was
eligible for execution according to a 2000 intelligence finding issued
by President Bill Clinton before leaving office in January. Yet on July
14th he was allowed to leave Dubai on a private jet and there were no
Navy fighters waiting to force him down.
In 1985 Oliver North - the only member of the Reagan-Bush years who
doesn't appear to have a hand in the current war - sent the Navy and
commandos after terrorists on the cruise ship Achille Lauro. In his 1991
autobiography "Under Fire," while describing terrorist Abu Abbas, North
wrote, "I used to wonder: how many dead Americans will it take before we
do something?" One could look at the number of Americans Osama bin Laden
is alleged to have killed before September 11 and ask the same question.
It gets worse, much worse. A more complete timeline listing crucial
events both before and after the September 11th suicide attacks, which
have been blamed on bin Laden, establishes CIA foreknowledge of them and
strongly suggests that there was criminal complicity on the part of the
U.S. government in their execution. It also makes clear that the events
which have taken place since September 11th are based upon an agenda
that has little to do with the attacks.
One wonders how these events could have been ignored by the major media
or treated as isolated incidents. Failing that, how could skilled news
agencies avoid being outraged, or at least even just a little
suspicious?
1. 1991-1997 - Major U.S. oil companies including ExxonMobil, Texaco,
Unocal, BP Amoco and Shell directly invest almost $3 billion in cash
bribing heads of state in Kazakhstan to secure equity rights in the huge
oil reserves in these regions. The oil companies further commit to
future direct investments in Kazakhstan of $35 billion. Not being
willing to pay exorbitant prices to Russia to use Russian pipelines the
major oil companies have no way to recoup their investments. [Sources
Testimony before the House International Relations Committee 2/12/98]
2. December 4, 1997 - Representatives of the Taliban are invited guests
to the Texas headquarters of Unocal to negotiate their support for the
pipeline. Subsequent reports will indicate that the negotiations failed,
allegedly because the Taliban wanted too much money. [Source: The BBC,
Dec. 4, 1997]
3. February 12, 1998 - Unocal Vice President John J. Maresca - later to
become a Special Ambassador to Afghanistan - testifies before the House
that until a single, unified, friendly government is in place in
Afghanistan the trans-Afghani pipeline needed to monetize the oil will
not be built. [Source: Testimony before the House International
Relations Committee.]
4. 1998 - The CIA ignores warnings from Case Officer Robert Baer that
Saudi Arabia was harboring an al-Q'aeda cell led by two known
terrorists. A more detailed list of known terrorists is offered to Saudi
intelligence in August 2001 and refused. [Source: Financial Times
1/12/01; See No Evil by a book by Robert Baer (release date Feb. 2002).
5. 1998 and 2000 - Former President George H.W. Bush travels to Saudi
Arabia on behalf of the privately owned Carlyle Group, the 11th largest
defense contractor in the U.S. While there he meets privately with the
Saudi royal family and the bin Laden family. [Source: Wall Street
Journal, Sept. 27, 2001. See also FTW, Vol. IV, No 7 - "The Best Enemies
Money Can Buy," - [link] /carlyle.html. ]
6. January, 2001 - The Bush Administration orders the FBI and
intelligence agencies to "back off" investigations involving the bin
Laden family, including two of Osama bin Laden's relatives (Abdullah and
Omar) who were living in Falls Church, VA - right next to CIA
headquarters. This followed previous orders dating back to 1996,
frustrating efforts to investigate the bin Laden family. [Source: BBC
Newsnight, Correspondent Gregg Palast - Nov 7, 2001].
7. Feb 13, 2001 - UPI Terrorism Correspondent Richard Sale - while
covering a trial of bin Laden's Al Q'aeda followers - reports that the
National Security Agency has broken bin Laden's encrypted
communications. Even if this indicates that bin Laden changed systems in
February it does not mesh with the fact that the government insists that
the attacks had been planned for years.
8. May 2001 - Secretary of State Colin Powell gives $43 million in aid
to the Taliban regime, purportedly to assist hungry farmers who are
starving since the destruction of their opium crop in January on orders
of the Taliban regime. [Source: The Los Angeles Times, May 22, 2001].
9. May, 2001 - Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, a career
covert operative and former Navy Seal, travels to India on a publicized
tour while CIA Director George Tenet makes a quiet visit to Pakistan to
meet with Pakistani leader General Pervez Musharraf. Armitage has long
and deep Pakistani intelligence connections and he is the recipient of
the highest civil decoration awarded by Pakistan. It would be reasonable
to assume that while in Islamabad, Tenet, in what was described as "an
unusually long meeting," also met with his Pakistani counterpart, Lt.
General Mahmud Ahmad, head of the ISI. [Source The Indian SAPRA news
agency, May 22, 2001.]
10. June 2001 - German intelligence, the BND, warns the CIA and Israel
that Middle Eastern terrorists are "planning to hijack commercial
aircraft to use as weapons to attack important symbols of American and
Israeli culture." [Source: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, September 14,
2001.]
11. July, 2001 - Three American officials: Tom Simmons (former U.S.
Ambassador to Pakistan), Karl Inderfurth (former Assistant Secretary of
State for South Asian affairs) and Lee Coldren (former State Department
expert on South Asia), meet with Pakistani and Russian intelligence
officers in Berlin and tell them that the U.S. is planning military
strikes against Afghanistan in October. A French book released in
November, "Bin Laden - La Verite´ Interdite," discloses that Taliban
representatives often sat in on the meetings. British papers confirm
that the Pakistani ISI relayed the threats to the Taliban. [Source: The
Guardian, September 22, 2001; the BBC, September 18, 2001.The Inter
Press Service, Nov 16, 2001]
12. Summer 2001 - According to a Sept. 26 story in Britain's The
Guardian, correspondent David Leigh reported that, "U.S. department of
defense official, Dr. Jeffrey Starr, visited Tajikistan in January. The
Guardian's Felicity Lawrence established that US Rangers were also
training special troops in Kyrgyzstan. There were unconfirmed reports
that Tajik and Uzbek special troops were training in Alaska and
Montana."
13. Summer 2001 (est.) - Pakistani ISI Chief General Ahmad (see above)
orders an aide to wire transfer $100,000 to Mohammed Atta, who was
according to the FBI, the lead terrorist in the suicide hijackings.
Ahmad recently resigned after the transfer was disclosed in India and
confirmed by the FBI. [Source: The Times of India, October 11, 2001.]
14. Summer 2001 - An Iranian man phones U.S. law enforcement to warn of
an imminent attack on the World Trade Center in the week of September
9th. German police confirm the calls but state that the U.S. Secret
Service would not reveal any further information. [Source: German news
agency "online.de", September 14, 2001, translation retrieved from
online.ie in Ireland.]
15. June 26, 2001 - The magazine indiareacts.com states that "India and
Iran will 'facilitate' US and Russian plans for 'limited military
action' against the Taliban." The story indicates that the fighting will
be done by US and Russian troops with the help of Tajikistan and
Uzbekistan. [Source: indiareacts.com, June 26, 2001.]
16. August 2001 - The FBI arrests an Islamic militant linked to bin
Laden in Boston. French intelligence sources confirm that the man is a
key member of bin Laden's network and the FBI learns that he has been
taking flying lessons. At the time of his arrest the man is in
possession of technical information on Boeing aircraft and flight
manuals. [Source: Reuters, September 13.]
17. August 11 or 12 - US Navy Lt. Delmart "Mike" Vreeland, jailed in
Toronto on U.S. fraud charges and claiming to be an officer in U.S.
Naval intelligence, writes details of the pending WTC attacks and seals
them in an envelope which he gives to Canadian authorities. [Source: The
Toronto Star, Oct. 23, 2001; Toronto Superior Court Records]
18. Summer 2001 - Russian intelligence notifies the CIA that 25
terrorist pilots have been specifically training for suicide missions.
This is reported in the Russian press and news stories are translated
for FTW by a retired CIA officer.
19. July 4-14, 2001 - Osama bin Laden receives treatments for kidney
disease at the American hospital in Dubai and meets with a CIA official
who returns to CIA headquarters on July 15th. [Source: Le Figaro,
October 31st, 2001.]
20. August 2001 - Russian President Vladimir Putin orders Russian
intelligence to warn the U.S. government "in the strongest possible
terms" of imminent attacks on airports and government buildings.
[Source: MS-NBC interview with Putin, September 15.]
21. August/September, 2001 - The Dow Jones Industrial Average drops
nearly 900 points in the three weeks prior to the attack. A major stock
market crash is imminent.
22. Sept. 3-10, 2001 - MS-NBC reports on September 16 that a caller to a
Cayman Islands radio talk show gave several warnings of an imminent
attack on the U.S. by bin Laden in the week prior to 9/11.
23. September 1-10, 2001 - In an exercise, Operation "Swift Sword"
planned for four years, 23, 000 British troops are steaming toward Oman.
Although the 9/11 attacks caused a hiccup in the deployment the massive
operation was implemented as planned. At the same time two U.S. carrier
battle groups arrive on station in the Gulf of Arabia just off the
Pakistani coast. Also at the same time, some 17,000 U.S. troops join
more than 23,000 NATO troops in Egypt for Operation "Bright Star." All
of these forces are in place before the first plane hits the World Trade
Center. [Sources: The Guardian, CNN, FOX, The Observer, International
Law Professor Francis Boyle, the University of Illinois.]
24. September 7, 2001 - Florida Governor Jeb Bush signs a two-year
emergency executive order (01-261) making new provisions for the Florida
National Guard to assist law enforcement and emergency-management
personnel in the event of large civil disturbances, disaster or acts of
terrorism. [Source: State of Florida web site listing of Governor's
Executive Orders.]
25. September 6-7, 2001 - 4,744 put options (a speculation that the
stock will go down) are purchased on United Air Lines stock as opposed
to only 396 call options (speculation that the stock will go up). This
is a dramatic and abnormal increase in sales of put options. Many of the
UAL puts are purchased through Deutschebank/AB Brown, a firm managed
until 1998 by the current Executive Director of the CIA, A.B. "Buzzy"
Krongard. [Source: The Herzliyya International Policy Institute for
Counterterrorism, [link], September 21; The New York
Times; The Wall Street Journal.]
26. September 10, 2001 - 4,516 put options are purchased on American
Airlines as compared to 748 call options. [Source: ICT - above]
27. September 6-11, 2001 - No other airlines show any similar trading
patterns to those experienced by UAL and American. The put option
purchases on both airlines were 600% above normal. This at a time when
Reuters (September 10) issues a business report stating, "Airline stocks
may be poised to take off."
28. September 6-10, 2001 - Highly abnormal levels of put options are
purchased in Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, AXA Re(insurance) which owns
25% of American Airlines, and Munich Re. All of these companies are
directly impacted by the September 11 attacks. [Source: ICT, above; FTW,
Vol. IV, No.7, October 18, 2001, [link]
oct152001.html. ]
29. It has been documented that the CIA, the Israeli Mossad and many
other intelligence agencies monitor stock trading in real time using
highly advanced programs reported to be descended from Promis software.
This is to alert national intelligence services of just such kinds of
attacks. Promis was reported, as recently as June, 2001 to be in Osama
bin Laden's possession and, as a result of recent stories by FOX, both
the FBI and the Justice Department have confirmed its use for U.S.
intelligence gathering through at least this summer. This would confirm
that CIA had additional advance warning of imminent attacks. [Sources:
The Washington Times, June 15, 2001; FOX News, October 16, 2001; FTW,
October 26, 2001, - [link] magic_carpet.html;
FTW, Vol. IV, No.6, Sept. 18, 2001 - [link]
sept1801.html; FTW, Vol. 3, No 7, 9/30/00 - www.copvcia.com/stories/
may_2001/052401_promis.html.
30. September 11, 2001 - Gen Mahmud of the ISI (see above), friend of
Mohammed Atta, is visiting Washington on behalf of the Taliban. [Source:
MS-NBC, Oct. 7.]
31. September 11, 2001 - Employees of Odigo, Inc. in Israel, one of the
world's largest instant messaging companies, with offices in New York,
receive threat warnin More >
|
|
|
|
4 Jan 2002 @ 15:02
This article could well remind us of some possible alternatives to the 'story of history'.
Gold Hawk technology
and the hijacked planes
by Ghayur Ayub
In 1962, some US military leaders designed a plan to conduct terrorist acts against Americans and blame Cuba, to create popular sentiment for the invasion of that country. It was coded as “Operation Northwoods”. It was based on the following parameters.
- Plan to shoot down a CIA plane designed to replicate a passenger flight and announce that Cuban forces shot it down.
- Create military casualties by blowing up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba. That would cause a helpful wave of indignation in the US newspapers.
- Develop a terror campaign in Miami and Washington DC.
On the 8th of June 1967, during the ‘six-day war’, the Liberty, an American intelligence gathering ship, was sailing in international waters. Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats attacked it for 75 minutes. When four US fighter jets from a nearby aircraft career came to protect it, the US Defence Secretary Robert McNamara ordered the jets not to come to its aid, and allowed the Israeli attack to continue. Thirty-four Americans were killed and 171 wounded. In April 2001, Britain’s International Television News stated, “a jet-powered aircraft, The Northrop Grumman Global Hawk, flew from Edwards Air Force Base in California and landed at the Royal Australian Air Force base at Edinburgh, in South Australia State. With the help of this technology the jet flies along a pre-programmed flight path, but a pilot monitors the aircraft during its flight via a sensor suite, which provides infra-red and visual images.” This is a robotized jet that has a wingspan of a Boeing 757 and 767-the jets used in the September terrorist attacks. According to Rod Smith, the Gold Hawk’s Australian manager, “The aircraft essentially flies itself, right from takeoff, right through to landing, and even taxiing off the runway.” Robert Ayling, a former boss of British Airways, mentioned in the Financial Times that “the aircraft could be commandeered from the ground and controlled remotely in the event of a hijack.” It is believed that the software can be fitted in any jet and it takes over the control by remote sensor from land making the pilots helpless. The Mossad, it is said, has the technology and developed its own software for the purpose.
“On September 10, 2001, The Washington Times ran a front-page story which quoted, the officers of the Army’s School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) saying that Mossad are ruthless and cunning and have the capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act. Twenty four hours later, the Pentagon was hit and the Arabs were being blamed.”
Now let us look at the hijacked planes and the skills of the pilots needed to manoeuver such difficult tasks in a coordinated manner. Writing on Flight 77 Boeing 757, the took off from Dallas Airport in North Virginia and crashed into Pentagon, the Washington Post stated. “Aviation sources said that the plane was flown with extraordinary skill, making it highly likely that a trained pilot was at the helm, possibly one of the hijackers. Someone even knew how to turn off the transponder, a move that is considerably less than obvious. The plane circled 270 degrees from the right to approach the Pentagon from the west, whereupon Flight 77 fell below radar level, vanishing from controller’s screens. “A very difficult manoeuvring. Looking at the track record of the suspected hijacked of that plane – Hani Hanjour, who was in his mid twenties, one finds he had a poor record of flying even the Cessna 172. According to the chief instructor, Marcel Bernard, his instructors told him that”, After three times in the air, they still felt he (Hani Hanjour) was unable to fly solo.” That was in the second week of August 2001. Barely one month before the attacks. Earlier in 1996, he got some training for a few months in Scottsdale, Ariz, but did not finish the course because instructors felt he was not capable of flying. The other alleged hijackers, Nawaq Alhazmi and Khalid Al-Midhar of the same flight were said to be “incompetent at the control” and “their mechanical skills were even worse.” Another instructor said about them, “they seemed like nice guys but in the plane, they were dumb and dumber.” How could they skillfully manoeuver a Boeing 757, with those skills is beyond apprehension.
The hijackers of the other two planes that hit the WTC had similar records. According to the Washington Post, Mohammed Atta, the alleged hijacker of Flight 11, a Boeing-767 which crashed into the worth tower and Marwanal-Al-Shehhi, the alleged hijacker of Flight 175, a Boeing-767 that crashed into the south tower, attended hundreds of hours of lessons at Huffman Aviation, a flight school in Venice, Florida. They also took lessons at Jones Aviation Flying Service Inc., which operates from the Sarasota Bradenton International Airport. According to their instructor, “They didn’t live up to our standards.” Again, how could they, with their bad track records and incomplete training, manoeuver those planes with precise accuracy to hit the targets with exactitude?
Let us come to the fourth plane, flight 93, a Boeing-757, which we are told crashed into an abandoned coal mine near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. According to ‘USA Today’, “Local residents said they had seen a second plane in the area, possibly an F-16 fighter, and burning debris falling from the sky.” The Time Magazine writes, “The largest pieces of the plane, still extant, are barely bigger than a telephone book.” The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review states, ‘Pieces of the wreckage have been found as far away as New Baltimore, about eight miles from the crash site. When the eastbound plane crashed, a 9-knot wind was blowing from the southeast.” The Washington Post reported that, just as Congressional leaders were discussing shooting the plane down, they learned it had crashed.
The official version is that it crashed because of brawl between the hijackers and some of the passengers. They already made one of the passengers of that brawl the hero. His name was Mark Bingham. His relatives appear regularly on TV channels. The finds of the wreckage and their being spread over eight miles does not correspond to a simple crash. Planes that crash do not disintegrate in this manner. The first TV network reports said exactly that: “Flight 93 had been shot down by a military jet.” That information even made it into the print media.
According to Carol Valentine, the President of Public Action Inc., and Curator of the Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum,” Before September 11, the combined forces of US military and domestic intelligence - the CIA, the FBI, the Defence Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency – were clueless that such a catastrophic event would occur. Yet a day or so later, the FBI had secured the names and mug shots of each of the 19 hijackers. How did the FBI know the hijackers were? After all, all the eyewitnesses are dead. How could the FBI distinguish between “regular” Muslims and hijacker Muslims on those flights? Or did they just go through the passenger lists culling out the Muslim-sounding names and labeling the people bearing those names as hijackers? “You’re Muslim so you’re a hijacker.”
She further writes, “On September 30, I looked at the passenger lists of those four flights. To my surprise, the lists contained none of the hijackers’ names. Here are the URLs I checked:
[link], http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims1AA77.victims.html, [link], http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trae.center/victims/ua93.victims.html.
Then I went searching on Usenet for more information. I found and noticed the hijackers’ names were not on the passenger lists on September 27, on alt.culture.Alaska, “Re: black boxes and bodies (2).” I don’t know what you’ll find when you look at the passenger lists, but the historical record is there.” Finally the conversations that took place between the pilots of the hijacked planes and the relevant control towers were kept secret for over four weeks after the attacks. Are these conversations being doctored by the relevant agencies? According to Carol Valentine, the conversation was not made public immediately because it would have shown that the pilots did not have control over the hijacked planes. She believes that those planes most probably were fitted with Gold Hawk technology. The New York Times, after a long delay published parts of the conversations between the two hijacked planes and the control towers that generated more confusion than clarity. In my previous article “Pointing Fingers” I counted nineteen instances that created doubts as to who could have massacred the instances that created doubts as to who could have massacred the innocents on September 11, 2001. I am still as confused as I was on the day of the disaster. Carol Valentine states that some important people in the sensitive departments and their allies were not opposed to kill Americans if they thought their goals were right… It also shows the American complicity in such situations.” It is believed by some that, over the years, Mossad has infiltrated some of the sensitive agencies and departments of USA.
When history is written in forty years down the road, the coming generation would know who planned the attacks, on WTC and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, just like today we know about the ‘Operation Northwoods’, planned about forty years ago, Up until then, we have to accept what the agencies tell us is true and the rest is a mere guess work. More >
|
|
|
