| New Report Challanges Fundementals Of GE. | |
|
28 Jan 2002 @ 15:19, by John Finn
NEW REPORT CHALLENGES FUNDAMENTALS OF GENETIC ENGINEERING January 15, 2002 >From a press release
NEW YORK -- A study released today reveals a critical, long-overlooked flaw in the science behind the multi-billion dollar genetic engineering industry, raising serious questions about the safety of genetically engineered foods. In a new review of scientific literature reported in the February issue of Harper`s Magazine, Dr. Barry Commoner, a prominent biologist demonstrates that the bioengineering industry, which now accounts for 25-50 percent of the U.S. corn and soybean crop, relies on a 40-year-old theory that DNA genes are in total control of inheritance in all forms of life. According to this theory -- the ``central dogma`` -- the outcome of transferring a gene from one organism to another is always ``specific, precise and predictable,`` and therefore safe.
Taking issue with this view, Commoner summarizes a series of scientific reports that directly contradict the established theory. For example, last year the $3 billion Human Genome Project found there are too few human genes to account for the vast inherited differences between people and lower animals or plants, indicating that agents other than DNA must contribute to genetic complexity.
The central dogma claims a one-to-one correspondence between a gene`s chemical composition and the structure of the particular protein that engenders an inherited trait. But Dr. Commoner notes that under the influence of specialized proteins that carry out ``alternative splicing,`` a single gene can give rise to a variety of different proteins, resulting in more than a single inherited trait per gene. As a result, the gene`s effect on inheritance cannot be predicted simply from its chemical composition -- frustrating one of the main purposes of both the Human Genome Project and biotechnology.
Commoner`s research sounds a public alarm concerning the processes by which agricultural biotechnology companies genetically modify food crops. Scientists simply assume the genes they insert into these plants always produce only the desired effect with no other impact on the plant`s genetics. However, recent studies show that the plant`s own genes can be disrupted in transgenic plants. Such outcomes are undetected because there is little or no governmental regulation of the industry. ``Genetically engineered crops represent a huge uncontrolled experiment whose outcome is inherently unpredictable,`` Commoner concludes. ``The results could be catastrophic.``
Dr. Commoner cites a number of recent studies that have broken the DNA gene`s exclusive franchise on the molecular explanation of inheritance. He warns that ``experimental data, shorn of dogmatic theories, point to the irreducible complexity of the living cell, which suggests that any artificially altered genetic system must sooner or later give rise to unintended, potentially disastrous consequences.``
Commoner charges that the central dogma, a seductively simple explanation of heredity, has led most molecular geneticists to believe it was ``too good not to be true.`` As a result, the central dogma has been immune to the revisions called for by the growing array of contradictory data, allowing the biotechnology industry to unwittingly impose massive, scientifically unsound practices on agriculture. ``Dr. Commoner`s work challenges the legitimacy of the agricultural biotechnology industry,`` said Andrew Kimbrell, Director of the Center on Food Safety. ``For years, multibillion dollar biotech companies have been selling the American people and our government on the safety of their products. We now see their claims of safety are based on faulty assumptions that don`t hold up to rigorous scientific review.``
The study reported in Harper`s Magazine is the initial publication of a new initiative called The Critical Genetics Project directed by Dr. Commoner in collaboration with molecular geneticist Dr. Andreas Athanasiou, at the Center for the Biology of Natural Systems, Queens College, City University of New York.
|
|
Category: Articles
3 comments
28 Jan 2002 @ 18:06 by istvan : links
[ http://www.cqs.com/gmohazard.htm ]
********
{ http://www.natural-law-party.org.uk/UKmanifesto/geneticengineering6.htm }
******** [ http://www.peoplesearth.org/links.htm ]
******** [ http://www.safe-food.org ]********
[ http://www.gefoodalert.org/pages/home.cfm ]
28 Jan 2002 @ 18:46 by : GE.
New Zealand last year had a Royal Commission on GE. The Commision after nine months of hearings with 98% of submissions against came out with a decision that supports GE field trails and then GE crops. Indiginous people (Maori) were 100% opposed on spiritual grounds they were ignored as were the anti GE submissions. There decision was based on "New Zealand cannot afford be left behind in GE technology. The anti GE activists were proposing that NZ become organic, a much better idea as the world organics market is one of the fastest growing markets there is. Howevere if we introduce GE into the open it will put at risk our organic crops. That is perhaps the plan of Monsanto and its ilk as then there is a level playing field, everywhere is contaminated.
22 Oct 2010 @ 03:24 by @66.79.163.110 : ghd mk4
Grandmother lived in the vegetable garden outside the village. Archlord gold We are just riding a motorcycle off the road, black from the vegetable plots ran the fastest to meet us. Because we go to when they are already fast at noon, so let's eat. I finished the meal, we went out looking for black to play.
When I saw the black when it's like I feel it seems hungry.world of warcraft gold I went to took a steamed bun, and then breaking off a small piece of the next, it said: "The black, if we should want to eat then." Finish, I put bread and threw the air. Black look, at once erected the whole body up.
2 small black claws on the air, and then big mouth,maple story mesos jump up, suddenly bite of the bread. I jumped up and patted its head, saying: "Well like, black, you're a hummer!" It is a large black tail Shuaile Shuai and gently biting the bite of my Yijiao that agreed. "This time you can not unilaterally!"
Other entries in Articles
13 Apr 2003 @ 21:48: REBUILDING IRAQ by: Naomi Klein
10 Apr 2003 @ 19:35: My Oscar "Backlash"
9 Apr 2003 @ 22:50: IRAQ IS A TRIAL RUN by Noam Chomsky
24 Sep 2002 @ 18:10: DEATH AND DISHONOUR
23 Sep 2002 @ 19:23: The New Ugly Americans by: George Ochenski
15 Sep 2002 @ 18:29: Afghanistan Is On The Brink Of Another Diaster: by Robert Fisk
7 Sep 2002 @ 21:21: "Against War"
29 Apr 2002 @ 01:48: The Machine by Edwardo Galeano
22 Apr 2002 @ 16:57: A Different Kind of Devastating:
1 Feb 2002 @ 18:56: The Great 9/11 Deception! Parts 1 and 2.
|
