 |
Emotional Art: Respect the Boundaries |
Category: Articles 9 comments
15 Jun 2008 @ 19:35 by bushman : Well 16 Jun 2008 @ 01:54 by mortimer : I look thru their eyes and.. I went to the backyard and puked, its a true story. My head is not marked by a rope or boundry and i prefer people not kick me in the teeth. yes Bushman, we are all feeling the same elephant and it seems the scientist dont want to respect our views. (we are not privileged) the Blind Men and an Elephant wiki link is what prompted a certian NCN member to delete all my post's, it is also what prompted that NCN member to mention private messages, now they find out the hard way, i have nothing to hide. 17 Jun 2008 @ 22:50 by a-d : yeahhh, right! " ..... A child must probe his boundries or he/she ends up afraid of his/her own shadow, or afraid to walk the Earth because he/she might step on a bug...." One of these CLASSIC Bushy stupidities, that he/you bushy/ deliver/s every so often.... say your own daughter had been convinced (by some Sicko) to test her own boundaries and doing it by pouring gasoline on herself and then put a match to herself, just to see if she goes up in flames -or not... would you just stand by and let her "test her boundaries" so that she learns "not to be afraid of stepping on bugs" ???.... (and how the bug is related to the destruction of her going up in flames --self-afflicted though as it might be... I/we would never know... but I certainly would wonder(about the LOGIC in & validity of) this kind of a statement! ; ).... Just because we(Humanity CAN blow up the Planet -and has the means... does it mean we SHOULD!?!... and to WHOM would that (or we ) make a point/"prove" something(WHAT -exactly that "Something" would be... ???? Could you, bushy, clue us --more ignorant-- in? ; ) ayayayayay..... : ) Take Care, buddy! ..and watch up for those bugs, so you don't crush "them"/us ALL... [ [link] ] 18 Jun 2008 @ 04:37 by mortimer : ire I should not test the boundaries of nature but instead meditate upon them and then the passport falls into the lap much like a coconut from a tree. 18 Jun 2008 @ 04:53 by bushman : lol I have enough common sence, and so do most people, your view is ludicrist, to the point of insanity, hey if your that dumb to leave gasoline around for your kid to light him or herself on fire, well then its your own damnd fault, as if my kid would ever be that lame to not know gasoline lights on fire. And as if it matters really in the long run, man does what man does. I seem to remember a meditating budist monk who dumped gas on himself and set himself alight, did that help the world? 
Your logic is simply broken AD, lol. Mankind will be long gone by the time he has the power to blow the planet up. Its more likly the planet would just blow up one day on its own, considering Suns blow up all the time without the help of some lame guy with a big bomb. My view is if you just sit around and worry about it your not doing anything to help either. Man is all about trial and error, always has been and always will be. Man will always make mistakes even if he does become some sort of God someday. Use your common sence and you probably wont do something really stupid. :} 18 Jun 2008 @ 05:06 by mortimer : quantum scientists, they seem to lack that connection Bushman, quantum scientists call that common sense ... naive realism. 18 Jun 2008 @ 07:54 by bushman : Well, Id be worried more about the past effects of nuclear testing, than smashing a few atoms one at a time. That might be so, but they know not to be smashing a handfull of plutonium so as to cause some nuclear accident. A single atom does release large amounts of energy but we are talking a duration of a micromillisecond, only a detector can see it, but as you say who knows who sees it in some other dimention, because they wont see if they accidently smashed some smaller than a Nutrino planet earth. But then the creator had to do something to create this universe, a very violent universe at that. Anyway dont you think the creator was operating within the relm of naive realisim when he/she/it created us? :} 18 Jun 2008 @ 09:12 by mortimer : Balance Infinity is incomprehensible and I think the Creator operates in the realm of infinity. Nobody can gawk infinity but, it seems many (quantum scientists) can gawk the concept of it. And when that happens, they can turn and point towards everything as being merely naive realism (* not respecting the ancestors). I suspect the problem is that quantum science started out with a false premise and ended up with one. They know what they discovered is nothing new, mystics (Shaman etc) been saying it for thousands of years but, instead of abandoning their world view, they try to maintain it and drag it like baggage into the mystical world view. If you look at history, you can see this is typical wisacu behavior (fat taker), instead of fully giving credit where due, instead of fully embracing the indigenous world view from its terms, scientist now try to embrace it from their scientific terms (anchor point). Concerning the word 'mystic', the connotation branches into a mixture of different meanings, I'm not referring to the Hollywood definition of 'mystic'. 18 Jun 2008 @ 20:20 by a-d : Heyyy, now you're talking sense! ".... Man is all about trial and error, always has been and always will be. Man will always make mistakes even if he does become some sort of God someday. Use your common sence and you probably wont do something really stupid. :}" ( why didn't you say THIS right away?!?.... this is a great statement!; has plenty logic in it! ) Btw; here is another statement, saying "exactly the same thing"!... and in different context to boot!...." Bucky maintained that mistakes are an integral part of learning (see Fuller's Mistake Mystique, see [link] ), Fuller maintained that the universe evolves by mistakes, learning ever more as it does so—and that includes mankind—no matter how dissociated our minds think we are from the originating phenomena of life." from the article here: [ [link] ] Common Sense: that must be the LEAST utilized of all our Cosmic Skills! All those "Scientists" telling us "all" about Quantum Mechanics/physics aren't doing very much more than we all can do --and do!.... looking at Life from Within and coming to Common Sense Conclusions --that (we, ourselves) might change/revise later on as we see other more Sensible Answers to the Big Questions! Quantum Mechanics by definition is about the smallest quanta of Something to trigger CHANGE (of the situation at hand) ( change in this case always is supposed to be for the Better) Anything that doesn't deal with this way of observation is simply the "scientist's own EGO/VIP ramblings! ; ) and does not in any way have any anchoring in Cosmic Truth of ascending energies (which always are for the Better! : ) )) Other entries in Articles 13 Jul 2008 @ 02:02: Destiny 8 Jul 2008 @ 04:37: Ancestor Alter 21 Jun 2008 @ 15:52: The River 19 Jun 2008 @ 10:09: Relationships 14 Jun 2008 @ 08:52: Control 26 May 2008 @ 19:26: newciv RSS 7 Jan 2008 @ 23:30: Gidi Ori Inu 5 Jan 2008 @ 15:37: Emotional Martial Art 5 Jan 2008 @ 15:33: Perfect Time and Place 5 Jan 2008 @ 15:30: Redline districts are neuron -districts
|
14 Jun 2008 @ 09:58, by Mike Smith