| jazzoLOG: Joni: New Art, Ballet, Music |
Category: Information 20 comments
5 Feb 2007 @ 05:38 by jazzolog : The Entire Times Interview 5 Feb 2007 @ 22:11 by judih : great thanks, jazz. This hits the spot. 13 Feb 2007 @ 18:35 by vaxen : Right... George Galloway's Speech to UK Parliament 10 Minute Video A powerful speech highlighting the appalling situation in Iraq, and the pathetic handling of it by the British government: Ill-equipped troops, brutal treatment of civilians, and support for death squads: Welcome to democracy, Bush & Blair style! [link] === “My heart is broken in the face of the stupidity of my species,” she said. “I can’t cry about it. In a way I’m inoculated. I’ve suffered this pain for so long. We were expelled from Eden. What keeps us out of Eden?” She thought about this for a moment before riffing on a Dylan line: “I tried to tell everybody, but I could not get it across.” “Well, I’m being more specific now,” she allowed. “The West has packed the whole world on a runaway train. We are on the road to extincting ourselves as a species. That’s what I meant when I said that we’ve got to get ourselves back to the garden.” 13 Feb 2007 @ 19:19 by celestial : This is how they think! What? You have voted a war with such rapidity and such indifference? Oh! It is a war war of no importance, it will cost only eight million dollars. And men? The men are included in the eight million dollars. ---Anatole France 14 Feb 2007 @ 00:03 by quinty : That's good Vax. Those lines, wherever they're from. And whoever wrote that, speaking of the dark, must have known many millions of us can share that same deep anguish. I remember my father staring sadly at me when I was little knowing I would have to lose some very basic illusions regarding life when I fully faced life and grew up. That sentiment, the one you quote above, is not that unusual. Have we, humanity, been given the unusual gift of being allowed to observe ourselves as we destroy ourselves? What a paradox! For if we truly are destroying our environment we can watch ourselves do it. Frankly, I think we should assume we are. What right have we, anyway, to so befoul our nest? &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& The words are Joni Mitchell's, Paul, found at the end of the interview in the first comment of the thread. ---jazzolog 14 Feb 2007 @ 11:54 by nraye : Truly inspired piece Jazzolog, esp. the intro, with seemingly accurate and appropriate insights : "....Joni didn't seem to need our illusions and fantasies about her as much as other performers though. ...." She must be a strong person to be thus and still smoke too! Maybe she enjoys a non polluted air area, and maybe she avoids the other 5 cardinal mistakes against the physique to compensate for the smoking. Some people are advised to smoke Ayurvedically, it is a way of getting movement into a traditionally settled place in the body, so maybe she is doing the right thing for her constitution! We are so propaganderised, brain washed, every minute of the day ads ads ads ads, catch phrases, newcasters' repetition aping your closest friendly person, we forget the real truths that do not actually fit into superficial reality of our techno world. Will return to read more leisurely. Thank you J. 16 Feb 2007 @ 19:37 by Quinty @72.195.137.102 : That's embarrassing and I apologize. I guess learning these things is growing up. As a kid I somehow believed all true barbaric human devilishness existed in the past. That civilization had advanced us out of truly vile behavior. And that when it happened it happened in other, backward nations. Not, with the exception of the South, in the United States. I suppose there are people who think that way here in the United States. Or else how is it possible for them to so easily believe Muslims and Arabs are evil? Swallowing such nonsense as "if we don't fight them there we will have to fight them here." Or that we are in "a war of civilizations," up against Islamo Fascism and have to stay in Iraq. I've heard plenty of Republican Congressmen claim all this in the House "debate" which has proceeded for the past three days on the war. 16 Feb 2007 @ 21:50 by vaxen : Hahaha... Nothing at all there to be embarrassed about Quinty san. One thing most Americans don't realize or don't want to is that the Government of this country was taken over lock stock and barrel in 1933 but the takeover was instantiated just prior to the check mate move at Jekylls' Island. The Jekyll Island accord. The death knell was heard after 1933 when all Americans were enslaved via the ingenious system of commerce then put in place. There is no Constitution, the UCC is the 'Law of the land,' the nation is broke, everyone is a debt slave who 'buys' into that system (The way out of it is through it!). That's the Tally and we know names and numbers. Indeed it is a war of civilizations...at least 'three.' Judeo-whatever, Islamo-Johnney come latelys, and Christiano-cretins... all three from a rumored source somwhere "over there" in the general sort of Baghdad, Iraquish, region. It's a no brainer. Fictions, legal or not, do not have rights. Those who choose to fall in with the ways of errant Washington will pay the price of ignorance for a very long time to come unless... 16 Feb 2007 @ 23:47 by Quinty @72.195.137.102 : "Indeed it is a war of civilizations...at least 'three.' Judeo-whatever, Islamo-Johnney come latelys, and Christiano-cretins... " Oy vey. 17 Feb 2007 @ 12:35 by jazzolog : You Mean This Guy's Not Our Great Hope? 17 Feb 2007 @ 18:04 by vaxen : Hahahahaha! Good one jazzo! He is being used, but he knows that. I mean, after all is said and done, isn't there a ''black'' pres in the made for TV mindwash called "24?" 24 hours, 24 little hours, that go on forever just to get ''the dagger'' across! Oh, also the guy that is playing Pres., on that bit of lunacy, is also in ''the UNIT (Hoo-Ra!)'' another mind wash entraining another such ''message'' to ''we the people!'' Hip, hip! Hip, hip! Hip, hop! Who be dat Ray? Hogey wins hands down... 17 Feb 2007 @ 21:18 by Quinty @72.195.137.102 : Chalk one up for for the Republicats As one far rightwinger said Oboma is an unknown, which is why he appeals to many Democrats. Not knowing much about him those Demos can pin their hopes and desires on the man. (As the cartoon demonstrates.) I do know that he was far more progressive when he ran for the Senate, and instantly dropped all that energy once he got in. Though he opposed the war from the beginning, which speaks well of him. Since he must have been thinking of running for the Senate at the time. Another thing I agree with the Repubs on is that the Iraq Study Group findings should have also been put up for a vote in the recent House vote on the war. The Repubs begged the House Rules Committee the night before to include such a vote. But the Dems having a nine to four majority in the committee shot the idea down. Had they included this vote and the possibility to debate ammendments the House vote would have been considerably more bipartisan. And this could have been more of a step forward. Now why would the Demos so limit the debate? Since the point is that some sort of withdrawal needs to be started and it would make sense to bring many more Republicans on board. Yes, the Baker Hamilton plan has its faults, but at least it's a start. It calls for negotiations which several Republicans favor. And it would have given the Congress a loud bipartisan voice to finally begin to impress upon the president that we need to change course and withdraw. Politics is a nasty racket. Okay Vax, sock it to me. When we naifs need our diapers changed I always know who to go to. And who to ask. I look forward to your consoling words. But seriously, have a good one.... Quinty 17 Feb 2007 @ 23:33 by steve mowrey @75.60.213.138 : jazz apostle embrace Richard, enjoying your immense, voluminous, & beautifully written blog---one of the best on the web. Going to spend most of weekend browsing archive. Moved by Maynard tribute. Fine stuff. Living in Lancaster w/ lovely Spanish professor. Joanna teaches @ Denison. Doing well. Best to Dana...try & get up to Cedar Falls sometime soon---incredible ice sculptures. Maybe more later. Keep up the great work. All best, Steve 17 Feb 2007 @ 23:52 by Quinty @72.195.137.102 : And yet another thing- This fund the troops resolution the Republicans have put up in both the House and Senate is a poison pill. Their language argues that to cut off funding for the war would be to leave the troops out there in their desert foxholes with no weapons or arms. So they, the pro war Repubs, cling to a somewhat primitive "support the troops" stance. That increased funding and moral support is only the way to go. The Demos have squelched that approach, not desiring to be seen as putting the troops in harms way. Desiring to avoid being tarred. So they simply removed the amendment from the floor. The jingo tone of "support the troops" has made many a (nearly) honorable member of the House or Senate laboriously explain that he or she truly does love the troops, and would never do anything to ever harm them, ad infinitim. As if anyone in either the Senate or House ever would. (With the exception of Vets benefits and whatever benefits Halliburton.) But the more moronic Repubs have conflated continuing the war with supporting the troops. And their more moronic constituents support this airy notion. After all, we don't want to have to "fight them here." What is truly sad (among many things) is that the Demos refuse to confront this argument head on. Let the Repubs put their "we will always fund the troops" amendments and resolutions onto the floor. And let them be debated, along with alternative amendments and resolutions which can clarify the air (and save Demo face.) As it is, the argument for "supporting the troops" means endless war. A foolish argument which is not that difficult to expose. But, instead, the Demos appear to want to rigidly control the votes on the floor, making themselves appear as if they are quashing dissent. And, alas, they are. An open and truly honest debate would be good for one and all. And on that one I agree with the Republicans. (Even if their arguments for the war are fudging.) 18 Feb 2007 @ 11:50 by jazzolog : Hope Joni Doesn't Mind in case she visits our humble site, this thread is not discussing her intricate chordal structures, but instead rages about the Power Elite and the precipice over which they've shoved the rest of the world. Scrooge's words live on: "If they'd (the poor) rather die (than submit to the treadmill and Poor Laws of 19th century London) they'd better do it, and decrease the surplus population!" I continue somewhat amused by Congressional debate that at this point, as far as I've been able to research, doesn't realize Bush already has moved troops around to secure his family and friends' oilfields. A month ago France24 showed a video of troops on the move from neighboring countries to Iraq. See it yourself [link] at the first link in the second comment, titled "What One Soldier Can Do." Besides that, the Associated Press reported Friday another deployment of 1000 was shipped out three months early from over here. [link] It's the Congress that's naive to think a man like Bush ever has done anything that anyone told him to do. I would say this to Vax though about the mindwash stuff. I'm a theater guy and may be more aware than most of what power the stage has in its various manifestations and rituals. In the classical Athens of Sophocles, the whole place shut down for a week each year and everyone went to see plays, but that's all the theatre they got. Today in the States there are 500 TV channels of drama available 24 hours of every day! Of course it's even more absurd than the 2 miles of aisles in every supermarket devoted to selling breakfast cereals. But that doesn't make either the performing arts or corn flakes wrong. What's wrong, as you surely agree, is the horrible appetite we've developed and the marketeers who pour the money into galvanizing the addictions. The sneer of greed will be remembered as the certain symptom this great country has lost its way. Let me say finally that if Steve Mowrey has managed to Google me down---and who knows why?---I may have to pack my bags and get out of town. Steve and I used to live on the same street some years back here in Athens, Ohio, and were known to carouse regularly---sometimes around great fires in his back yard, and always near turntables bellowing out honking saxophones. He has a wonderful history in these parts of encouraging writing on the published page...but I'll have to return the Google to see if he now corrupts the Internet. I'm flattered of course that he's spent some time at jazzoLOG. 18 Feb 2007 @ 17:08 by Quinty @72.195.137.102 : And, indeed Bush and his crowd seem to be the apatheosis of greed. A culmination of the corporate spirit. Is Bush confused about his role? Probably not in his own mind. For, judging by his body language and mannerisms, he seems to see himself as a Commander in Chief AND CEO. Which is not exactly like a president. Have any other pres's gone about saluting EVERYBODY besides those in uniform? He even seems to have a taste for military uniforms. This seems reminiscent of former leaders elsewhere who had a thing for corporations and military uniforms, which doesn't seem to bother Bush. Or does he even know? Free enterprise - a worldview which has deep roots here in America, as it does elsewhere. Business, the family, religion: no politician will tread on any of these things. And what with the triumph of the corporate spirit here (temporary?) those with a milder vision, the poets and philosophers (those who are seen as rebels), have been nudged aside. But that's the way it's always been too. Bush though would have made a poor Medici. They at least knew who to hire though, if you have been to Florence, you know they didn't always have good taste either. 18 Feb 2007 @ 17:19 by Quinty @72.195.137.102 : And not only has the Bush administration brought us the apotheosis of corporate greed, they feel no compuction against force. Which along with their lack of concern for the environment and the public good may be their worst crime. Their easy reliance on war. I recently read something by by Eric Fonner, the American Civil War historian, and without mentioning who he said that he had once believed Andrew Johnson was our worst president. No more. Sometimes less is indeed more. Leaving that blank was such a tantalizing incrimination on our current administration. 19 Feb 2007 @ 23:20 by vaxen : Nothing new... Didn't know that you played saxaphyone, jazzolog? I wrote a brief to COngressman Ron Paul today conceerning how I do not believe anything that anyone 'up there' has to say anymore. Not that I ever did for I've known about the fictitious "UNITED STATES CORPORATION" for far too long. I was, in mnay respects, an absolute fool to come back to this country but I'd lost whatever faith I'd had in Israel and, even though I could have gone to Milan, married into a 'wealthy' family and lived out the rest of my days studying Torah and Talmud... that, did not seem to be 'the way' for little old me. ALong the same lines here is a neato for you to sink your teeth into: The neocon pundit Frank Gaffney had his war lust tempered a bit last week when he invoked a fake quote by Lincoln in a Washington Times column in which he viciously attacked congressional opponents of an escalation of the war in the Middle East to Iran and beyond. He called them all traitors by quoting Dishonest Abe as supposedly saying, "Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled, or hanged." The source of the quote was a December 23, 2003 Insight magazine column by Michael Waller, who now admits that the quote is not genuine. How disappointed our Strangelovian neocons (a.k.a., the Republican Party) must be. Poor Rep. Don Young of Alaska was forced to apologize for calling his congressional colleagues traitors under the supposed cover of "Father Abraham," as the Jaffa cult calls him. In a supreme act of humility, Congressman Young confessed to the Washington Post on February 16 that he "was not advocating the hanging of Democrats." (Not yet, anyway.) But there is hope for our twenty-first century Dr. Strangeloves. Even if Lincoln never said the above statement, there is no denying that he did, in fact, arrest and exile Democratic Congressman Clement Vallandigham in 1863. And, he and his administration went on record on numerous occasions to say that all those who opposed them were guilty of treason. That’s why as many as 30,000 Northern citizens (or more) were imprisoned without due process during the Lincoln regime. The ultimate penalty for treason at the time was death by hanging. In fact, Lincoln believed that anyone who simply remained silent, and did not actively support his regime, was behaving in a treasonous manner. In his own words: "The man who stands by and says nothing when the peril of his Government is discussed cannot be misunderstood. If not hindered, he is sure to help the enemy; much more if he talks ambiguously – talks for his country with 'buts' and 'ifs' and 'ands.'" (Roy Basler, The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, vol. 6, p. 264). Waller says that his editor at Insight mistakenly put quotations around the quote, when in fact they were his words, not Dishonest Abe’s. If so, then one would have a very difficult time arguing with Waller’s interpretation of Lincoln’s behavior. When the British captured Washington, D.C. and set the White House on fire during the War of 1812 President James Madison, "father of the Constitution," never dreamed of mass arresting and imprisoning all dissenters, shutting down the opposition press, and deporting congressional opponents of his war policy, as Lincoln did. When Jefferson’s election as president spawned a secession movement among the New England Federalists, he announced in his first inaugural address that if there were any who wanted to break apart the union they should be left unmolested as a testament to the strength of Americans’ belief in a free society. It was Lincoln who, immediately upon taking office, declared himself dictator, ignored the Constitution, abolished civil liberty in the Northern states, and waged total war on fellow citizens, killing 300,000 of them because they no longer consented to being governed by Washington, D.C. and politicians like himself. He did all of this on behalf of an abstraction he labeled "the mystic chords of union." This was not unlike how future tyrants would kill hundreds of thousands, or millions, of their own people for the sake of "creating socialist man," "the master race," and other collectivist abstractions. Hope you guys are friends and that you're not going to have to call us MIBs in for some kind of 'extraction?' Jolly O! Tally Ho! See ya in the ''White House' jazz... Quinty one of the most glaring mis-takes of the whole Constitutional 'res/thing' is the union of the Chief Executives' role with that of Comm-ander in Chief. Absurd. In fact none of these puppets matters at all. Set your sights on Higher kill... 19 Feb 2007 @ 23:46 by Quinty @72.195.137.102 : Yo, Vax. What about the slavery issue? That didn't lurk deeply somewhere among Lincoln's, the South's, and the Northern Abolitionists' concerns? Considering how that war got beneath Lincoln's skin and became a transcendent issue, so that he redefined the American union, modernizing it, so to speak, with ideals we admire and define ourselves with today ("government of the people, by the people, and for the people") suspending habeas corpus seems a small thing. Nor, judging from the transcendence of his speeches, did personal power (its desire and possession) ever corrupt his ambitions. Words of the sort found in the Second Inaugural do not come to empty fakes. And I think it is safe to say Lincoln's humanity was also very great. Anyway, Lincoln had genius in both politics and in philosophy and literature. And that ain't no small thing. 18 Nov 2007 @ 12:54 by jazzolog : Joni's New Album---And Herbert The new CD, entitled Shine, came out in late September, and obviously I've taken my time getting to it. Ultimately my daughter, who's 16, asked Where is it, Dad? I guess I didn't have the eagerness I sometimes get to go for it before any reviews are out. I had heard her a couple years ago, and she sounded so husky I feared a little we might be headed toward a Billie Holiday repeat. I knew the ballet was involved in this project too, so I wondered whether there'd be a DVD---but the fact is I just didn't pursue it. Often I feel if something's truly sensational, I'll hear about it...even stuck out here in the sticks as I am. But Ilona's question got me moving and I went after some reviews. Hmmm, mixed, lukewarm, disappointed, concerns over the Starbucks connection. Amazon was offering a special deal (still is) of Shine plus Herbie Hancock's tribute to Joni, entitled The River. The lineup with Hancock looked stupendous...including Joni herself. I ordered it---and, Amazon being Amazon, it arrived almost as soon as I'd finished brewing a cup of coffee. Let me say upfront I like both albums very much. As far as I'm concerned Joni sounds great---not really husky at all, but with a somewhat deeper range...down into Diana Kral territory, which just might shake up that lady a bit. Her voice has an edge to it now, which we jazz fans might characterize as "swinging." We all know she started moving into jazz territory some 30 years ago, and almost everybody gritted their teeth and maybe most bid her farewell. The songs that followed often were insolent, deeper, even profound---songs we're still just catching up with. But jazz chops she did not have...and the audience dwindled. Then 10 years ago, she said Forget it, I'm not doing it anymore---and except for an occasional project that didn't involve new composition, she retired to her house by the sea. Whether she was woodshedding out there I don't know, but man the woman is ready. She's worked with wunderkind jazz drummer Brian Blade now for some time, and he may have helped her sharpen her time. She still can bring back the willowy, waving dreamer girl when she needs to, but the melancholy has darkened with age and her upset with governments is seething with sardonic anger. "Shine on the Catholic Church, and the prisons that it owns. Shine on all the churches: They all love less and less." The Hancock album apparently has 10 cuts, but Amazon claims that its offering somehow carries 12. It's true that it does, and if it's the only place to get it that way, maybe you should, because the extra 2 are really good...especially his lovely and simple treatment of A Case Of You. Seven of the 12 have vocals, all by different people. Joni brings a new version of Tea Leaf Prophecy that I much prefer to the original. Norah Jones attempts Court And Spark, but here's another lady who might do well to develop some of that edgy swing. Tina Turner's here and sounds sensational---with a nice wah-wah guitar backing that takes me back to Motown. Luciana Souza is subdued and appropriately shattered in her treatment of Amelia. The standout however is Leonard Cohen, who recites Joni's Jungle Line rather than attempting to sing it. Hancock (I just can't call him "Herbie" anymore) improvises behind or underneath or something, and while I'm not a poetry & jazz kind of guy this performance is positively brilliant. So the weekend has been all about Joni---when we weren't doing mucho chores---and I'm glowing from it. Of course last night, Amelia ringing in our ears, we had to get out the DVD of Shadows And Light and see the whole thing---with of course the epiphany being Pat Matheny's genius cadenza, with Lyle Mays providing pillows for his Pat's every leap, followed by Hejira with video of Joni flying across ice on skates. If you've never seen anything from that tour of nearly 30 years ago, do seek it out. Jaco Pastorius on bass and the late Michael Brecker, who just achieved Down Beat Hall of Fame stature, on tenor and soprano. And it's a good chance to see what a stupefying guitar player Joni is. Duke Ellington used to compliment special people by saying they were "beyond category." I can't think of anybody more deserving of that kind of praise than this lady. Joni's website has every review they can find...including the bad ones, like Christgau's scathing summary for Rolling Stone. [link] I found of special value the one from Associated Press [link] and an interview with Joni in which she discusses each new song [link] . Amazon's page for the Hancock is here [link] . Other entries in Information 14 Jun 2008 @ 12:53: Flag Day 9 Mar 2008 @ 14:01: What Will It Take? 2 Jan 2008 @ 01:01: The Catastrophic Support Circle 24 Oct 2007 @ 09:27: Elyse Under Surveillance 6 Jul 2007 @ 10:57: Department Of Divine Intervention 16 Apr 2007 @ 14:18: What Is Self-Sufficient---And Are You? 15 Nov 2006 @ 10:52: HaHa Thisaway HaHa Thataway! 28 Aug 2006 @ 09:27: The Old Telephone 21 Jun 2006 @ 11:07: A Woman Shall Lead Us 21 Sep 2005 @ 10:07: America Dies In Its Sleep
|