29 Mar 2005 @ 20:02
Okay.... why has this occurred....
These are not quality of life or death issues
but "quality of consciousness" issues.
It is Terri Shivo's and our state of consciousness
that would appear to be on trial.
Is thess states consciousness not worthy, not valueable, not legal,
not useful, not constructive, not legitimate, not ethical,
not realistic, not reasonable, not functional, not sustainable.....
not tangible..... difficult question yet how are we to judge
the state of one and others consciousness,
Who is to say whether one state is better or more legal
or allowable than an other yet we seem or some seem
to be making such considerations.
What determines a "legitminate and quality" state of consciousness
and how would we know? How can we judge? Do we do autopsies
after the fact to determine whether someones state of consciousness
was permitted? Yet why are we doing it then. It is illogical and irrational.
Yet we seem to require some manner to assess consciousness or the
state of consciousness in a legitmate and functional manner. How?
I support and vote for the "Woodstock Consciousness" as an example
of what is possible through a swarm intelligence and stigmergic modeling. More >
|