New Civilization News: Web2.0    
 Web2.017 comments
8 Apr 2006 @ 23:44, by Flemming Funch

"Web2.0" is one of the hot buzzwords right now. But a fuzzy term that a lot of people seem to dislike, because, well, it is a buzzword, and there's not wide agreement on what exactly it is, or whether it really is something new. But largely it has something to do with a new breed of websites that have more sophisticated user interfaces, particularly ones that use Ajax to update stuff on the page without having to reload it. And it has something to do with engaging large numbers of people in contributing content and in adding value to existing content. And it has something to do with web services, like RSS feeds. I.e. standardized ways one can access stuff, no matter where it comes from. And thus that new possibilities open for creating "mashups", i.e. new combinations of data from various sources. For example, Flickr is a photo sharing site, and it makes it easy for you to show those pictures in all sorts of settings other than their own site. GoogleMaps allow you to create maps based on their data, putting your own stuff on the maps.

Dion Hinchcliffe is one of the most articulate proponents for Web2.0, providing ongoing updates on his blog on where it is at. Like, see his recent State of the Web2.0. From there, a little overview of what it IS:
For those who don't follow it all the time, it might even be hard to remember what all the pieces of Web 2.0 are (and keep in mind, these elements are often reinforcing, so Web 2.0 is definitely not a random grab bag of concepts). Even compact definitions are sometimes a little hard to stomach or conceptualize But the one I like the best so far is Michael Platt's recent interpretation just before SPARK. Keep in mind, the shortest definition that works for me is that "Web 2.0 is made of people." However, it's so short that important details are missing and so here's a paraphrase of Platt's summary.

Key Aspects of Web 2.0:

- The Web and all its connected devices as one global platform of reusable services and data
- Data consumption and remixing from all sources, particularly user generated data
- Continuous and seamless update of software and data, often very rapidly
- Rich and interactive user interfaces
- Architecture of participation that encourages user contribution

I also wrote a review of the year's best Web 2.0 explanations a while back and it goes into these elements in more detail if you want it. But there's a lot more to Web 2.0 than these high level elements would indicate. A key aspect not mentioned here, though I cover it in Sixteen Ways to Think in Web 2.0, is the importance of user ownership of data. The centrality of the user as both a source of mass attention (over a hundred million people, probably 2 or 3 times that many, are online right now) and an irreplaceable source of highly valuable data, generally encourages that the user be handed control of the data they generate. If control over their own attention data is denied them, they will just go to those who will give them that control. This gives some insight into the implications of Web 2.0 concepts, which were mostly gathered by examining prevailing trends on the Web. Forrester is calling the resulting fall out of these changes Social Computing and it'll be interesting to see what the effects of the widepsread democratization of content and control will ultimately be a generation from now.
From the comments to Dion's blog posting, it is obvious that there's a lot of disagreement. About half of them seem to think that Web2.0 is a useless buzzword that just muddles everything. But some of them are also helpful with definitions. Nathan Derksen:
"Web 2.0 is comprised of applications that use sophisticated user interfaces, that use the Internet as an operating system, that connect people, and that encourage collaboration."
OK, that's simple and clear. Or, to give an idea of where it came from, from Varun Mathur:
On April 1st, 2004, Google launched GMail, which went on to ignite the whole Web 2.0 / AJAX revolution which we are witnessing right now. There is no agreed definition of Web 2.0. I like to think of it as the re-birth or second-coming of the web. The Web 2.0 websites are more like web applications, and have a rich, highly interactive and generally well designed user interface. They could also be using web services offered by other sites (for eg, Google Maps, Flickr photo web service, etc). Syndication and community are also associated with a site being Web 2.0. AJAX is the technical term which is responsible for the increased interactiveness of Web 2.0 websites. But the fundamentals remain the same - what's under the hood of a Web 2.0 application is as important as it was a few years ago.
OK, it seems that it is part Collective Intelligence and part more lively user interfaces. It is about creative engaging, immersive websites that form open communities. Not communities as in a member forum, which is something that has existed for a number of years. But community with less barriers and boundaries, where one rather freely can both contribute and consume lots of stuff in real time.

And, yes, maybe nothing very obviously new, but rather what the web was supposed to be all along. But in a more bottom-up and pragmatic kind of way. Being allowed to contribute and share more widely, and have somewhat uniform access to the contributions of many others, but without very many restrictions being imposed on y ou. An evolution, rather than a revolution. But it seems that collective intelligence becomes more visible and more a target, which changes things.

[< Back] [New Civilization News]



9 Apr 2006 @ 13:14 by Lionel @ : Web 2.1
Hello, Flemming,

I've got the impression that 2.0 is a new technosocial step, where everyone can choose the way one interacts with others.

See you,  

12 Apr 2006 @ 01:05 by ming : Web2
Yes, definitely about more flexibility in choosing how to interact, both with information and with each other.  

12 Apr 2006 @ 04:31 by James T. Rigsby @ : Access to:
Discussions have to come to consensus of sorts. Trans cendental, movement, is plausable Astral projection. So does any one remember the scientific stuff for the vibratory rates of different planes of reality? I can't remember where I heard of that. {was it in castenada?} Any way were is the access point to First: Web2, Second: The Collective Unconciousness, Third:That next evolutionary step for humanity---the door to eternity.  

10 Sep 2006 @ 23:05 by home security system @ : forestation
I am using technology to share a thought or two. The main lesson is to never stop learning. Reading and seeking other points of view like visiting your blog is one way. Finding what is ultimately important leads one to appreciate actuality, efficiency and mindfulness. Helping others to see some of the forest through the trees is a benefit of age and maturity.  

29 Apr 2016 @ 09:26 by Bandar Togel @ : brilliant! I would like to share this ar
Togel Online Singapore
Togel Online Hongkong
Bandar Togel Singapore
Bandar Togel
Togel Online Terpercaya
Bandar Togel Online Terpercaya
Togel Online
Agen Togel Online Terpercaya
Agen Togel Online  

17 Jul 2016 @ 03:33 by Kaydence @ : emTHiBLvrr  

27 Aug 2016 @ 01:04 by Jera @ : IaGjtvoEUfSjp takes into auto insure car employed often high side side simple  

13 Sep 2016 @ 07:51 by xender for pc @ : xender for pc

1 Oct 2016 @ 07:57 by Maud @ : XvoUuUOdMmGCVQ  

17 Oct 2016 @ 15:11 by yakuza4d2 @ : togel online hongkong
thank you for providing web were very nice and helpful
Buku mimpi  

31 Oct 2016 @ 05:00 by uc browser for pc  @ : erfb
snapchat windows
snapchat for linux
snapchat app
android phone
windows phone  

1 Nov 2016 @ 18:52 by yakuza4d2 @ : agen togel
thank you for providing web were very nice and helpful
Buku mimpi  

16 Nov 2016 @ 16:33 by Espn @ : RHUxznhqtBbRFLXH  

28 Nov 2016 @ 18:55 by trio4d @ : togel online
was very helpful and very useful
articles that you provide very helpful and nice to everyone thanks
Buku mimpi  

6 Dec 2016 @ 14:45 by Agen Sbobet @ : Sbobet
Would you be interested in exchanging links?  

26 Dec 2016 @ 08:22 by Jaycee @ : YUAQiRHUuFWeEcoJThCe├╝berweisen.html  

13 Jan 2017 @ 22:50 by Boston @ : rDItoHoAvzDFODY  

Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:

Other entries in
10 Jul 2010 @ 13:01: Strong Elastic Links
13 Oct 2008 @ 14:42: Call for Papers: (Online) Conference On Systemic Flaws and Solutions 2009
25 Oct 2007 @ 21:47: Static or dynamic web metaphors
28 Mar 2007 @ 05:36: The Tyee - Vancouver's Online Newspaper
11 Jul 2006 @ 15:12: Response to Josep L.I. Ortega's Statement for Unity of Action
25 May 2006 @ 10:14: Squidoo lenses
10 Jan 2006 @ 22:55: Agora and Antigora
14 Dec 2005 @ 15:15: Ruby on Rails
19 Nov 2005 @ 14:12: Saving the net from the pipe owners
21 Oct 2005 @ 19:01: declaration of blogocracy

[< Back] [New Civilization News] [PermaLink]?