| New Civilization News: Humiliation and Terrorism |
Category: Violence, War 11 comments
14 Jan 2004 @ 03:53 by swanny : I wonder....???/ 14 Jan 2004 @ 04:09 by swanny : The Dignity of Being I...... I think allowing each other the dignity of and to being a soveriegn person, group, state, society, globe in ones or our own right.......is not about mere pride...... but dignity..... Allowing perhaps even demanding we respect and grant each other the dignity of each others' simply being. radical perhaps...... bold.....perhaps but true..... alas sir swan 14 Jan 2004 @ 06:39 by lugon @195.53.174.19 : pride, dignity, self-esteem Overlaping concepts? I don't know. The word "self-esteem", to me, highlights an important point: it's about WHO gives "the thing" (respect, love, etc) to the person in question. To me, self-esteem is like the weekly or monthly pay one gets from an employer, only we are the employer. If that's the case, then clearly that one ammount of "cash" is made of several parts: - There's the "basic pay": you receive it every week or month, even if your productivity is below average. - There's the "productivity pay", "incentives", or whatever you call it: you receive more if you have made the company earn more money, etc. - There is also the "danger complement": if you serve under fire you should get more money than if you serve in an office. (Well, certain offices are quite dangerous too.) - There could be other items. So a girl that has become pregnant should love herself for several reasons: - she is a human being ("basic pay") - she is doing something valuable (the child) - she is in certain above-average dangers and extra work Somewhat ironically, in this scheme, people who have a depression should love themselves more *because* they have a disease! All this rant is to say that maybe if terrorists learn to respect themselves regardless of other people's opinions, then they might not be needing other's aproval. On the other hand, apreciation is learned when young, so ... Yes, I think the powerful do have something to change. Everyone has. 14 Jan 2004 @ 11:19 by sharie : humiliation comes from betrayal Humiliation comes from human betrayal. It is a betrayal of humanity to treat human beings as though their lives are worthless, their health is irrelevant, their survival is immaterial, their happiness is pointless... To feel that you're treated like you're worthless... while knowing and feeling your life is infinitely valuable... (everyone *is* infinitely valuable) and to then choose to die in order to prove your worth... this is insane. People - and not just muslims - are driven *mad* by the insanity of the greedy money grubbing going on in this world. The exploitation, the lies, the betrayal... We should all put an end to it. And we can... simply by choosing wisely where we spend our money. 14 Jan 2004 @ 13:07 by Mike @138.88.68.203 : Child Abuse? I was reading this today: 'The History of Child Abuse', at [link] . It may be interesting to compare rates of clitoridectomy and terrorist production by country. (However, afaik, it's not a practice in SA, more in Africa, dunno about SE Asia). Even if not, the two-word solution for terrorism may well be 'empower women'. There may be a tradeoff here for freedom: some (not all) porn could be cast as implicitly pro-terrorism. 14 Jan 2004 @ 14:20 by ming : Child Molestation I somewhere read statistics of how boys who were circumcised were something like 7 times as likely to end up in jail as boys who weren't. And a similar thing for violent crimes. I can't find it right now, however, so I might not have gotten the number right, but it was rather dramatic. So, yes, ritual violence against and sexual repression of little children is quite likely to have repercussions later on in terms of them being more violent. 14 Jan 2004 @ 20:24 by taranga @217.158.116.99 : circumcision That can't be true of all the Jewish communities around the world? The percieved humiliation may just be a reinterpretation by the individuals concerned of a sense of complete powerlessnes in the face of the relentless globalisation of the large corporations and their complete disregard for any cultural, social or spiritual objections to their activities. 15 Jan 2004 @ 08:10 by scotty : Perhaps we simply haven't yet learned to treat others as we ouselves would like to be treated ! 15 Jan 2004 @ 17:01 by Mike @138.88.68.203 : missing the point Read the article. Main thesis seems to be evolution of child-rearing is like long-term (generational) psychotherapy for the human race. Different societies raise children differently. Some (especially the west) are far better at it than others. Raising children well involves (among other things) not causing childhood traumas on the parents. 19 Jan 2004 @ 15:52 by bkodish : 'Humiliation' No 'humiliation' in a vacuum. If you would understand 'humilation', take a close look at the 'humiliatees'. 19 Jan 2004 @ 16:14 by ming : Humiliation Indeed, it is of course not as simple as blaming somebody else for making some folks feel bad. And feeling bad has never been a valid justification for anybody going out and then doing bad things to others. But, still, many bad things can be avoided by trying to avoid deliberately making large numbers of people feel bad in that particularly motivating way that humiliation can. Other entries in Violence, War 5 Sep 2008 @ 11:35: BEIJING OLYMPICS: LAST GAMES, AS WORLD WAR III COMES 17 Aug 2008 @ 12:48: AUGUSTUS CEASAR OR BONAPARTE RETURNED TO ROLE-PLAY GLOBAL TYRANT 9 Apr 2008 @ 15:44: An Introduction To Social Pathology Of Police And Federal Agents 3 Apr 2008 @ 18:10: Few Care To Listen, *Until They Discover That... 12 Nov 2007 @ 11:23: Re: happy veteran's day & Pakistan? 17 Sep 2007 @ 09:57: This Is Worse Than Viet Nam 28 Aug 2007 @ 19:56: AmericanMilitaryCoup-2012 16 Aug 2007 @ 23:55: The War Ahead 8 Aug 2007 @ 17:44: G Is For Genocide - 4 Aug 2007 @ 17:01: Israels' Jewish Problem
|