|New Civilization News: Synchronicity and the Web|
10 comments20 Jun 2004 @ 05:18 by Yenayer @184.108.40.206 : Synchronicity
You wrote :
"What most people want is out there, and probably close by. What most people offer is needed somewhere, probably close by.
We could very well get used to having things matched up effortlessly, rather than having to spend a lot of energy looking for things that aren't there. And lot of things would just be working, by lightning speed."
Isn't synchronicity about things that you don't know that you wanted, as Rebecca Blood puts it ( Richard McManus quoted her ) : "pointing readers to things that they didn't know they wanted to see".
You gave this example :
"I vaguely hear somebody mention a book at another table in a restaurant. I walk into a bookstore five minutes later, and there it is on the shelf, and when I open it, I realize it is very interesting and relevant to me. That's a synchronicity."
You did not know that you needed this book.
It's not about looking for an information you needed ( suitable plane flight ).
How could it be possible to match a need we don't know about with an offer ? Could we design an engine doing that ?
There is a question in my mind : How can we make the difference between "synchonicity" and "serendipity". My first anwser is to say that serendipity occurs when we are searching ( we have the purpose of searching ) something and then we find something else that happens to be relevant to us. And sinchronicity occurs when we are just living, socializing, talking, listening to the people around us. ( like in the restaurant )
Sorry for my bad english :-)
20 Jun 2004 @ 07:23 by spiritseek : maybe
Are we actually tapping into that universal intelligence web? Do we already know the answers but have trouble recalling them? Is there spiritual guides ready to help us when we ask? Whats really weird is some of the things I write or draw when finished gives me a feeling I've done it before.
20 Jun 2004 @ 07:31 by ming : Matching what we don't know
Right, synchronicity is normally the unknown, unexpected stuff. But I do imagine that we can increase that by technological means. Not the stuff we're deliberately searching for, but the stuff we have information about, but didn't think of searching for.
In the example above with the book, if I had a robotic assistant that listened in on what is going on around me, it might have recorded the conversation at the next table. And somehow identified that a book was being talked about. And then when I walk into a bookstore, it would scan the visual image around me, or it would access the inventory of the bookstore. And it would try to match up anything it can. Including all books mentioned around me recently. And it brings the matches to my attention.
OK, that's a bit beyond current capabilities, but not all that much. For a program to understand the conversation at the next table - that is hard. Looking at the bookshelves with me, and decoding what we're looking at - that is hard too. But they will be possible before too long. In the meantime, it would be useful also if we constrained ourselves to less fuzzy sources. Like, books mentioned on weblogs, or the names of people or organizations.
Serendipity - yeah, I guess we could say that's a couple of degrees less magical than synchronicity. Like, how one can quickly find something interesting, simply by doing a search on google, including stuff one didn't expect.
11 Sep 2004 @ 13:52 by Sebastien Leclerc @220.127.116.11 : Technological solution
Very interesting. I sit down this morning, open up www.bloglines.com and follow seb's open research (http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/) and find out this article.
I have been introduced to the reality of synchronicity through the very interesting book from James Redfield, The Celestine Prophecy. In this book, the synchronicity happends as a natural thing, provided that one keeps an open mind follow it's instincts. This book was an eye opener to me, as I realised that the best moves in my life all originated from coincidences.
The next book that got my attention was "Fingerprints of the gods". Although historical conclusions of the book can be criticised, it is truely amazing to see what prehistorical human beings were capable of achieving in different areas like astronomy, mathematics, and the knowledge of the universe.
There are many other books I read about these ancient cultures. There are many different allusions to the use of crystals. Were they some kind of antenna, amplifiers? Did they really exist? Did we forget how to use them when the earth got through thousands of years of glaciation?
We are now in a new technological area. Information is flowing increasingly faster and faster. People are connecting at a high rate, sometimes for a very short period of time. However, we are "trapped" in the interfaces that evolved from the personal computer evolution.
The proliferation of smart mobile phones in cities could useful after all. Their power could be harnessed, specially with technologies like bluetooth being more and more widespread. Phones or other devices having peer to peer capabilities could exchange with each other about the topics published by their owners.
These topics would be hooks that would vibrate the phone when a compatible hook would be found.
If I take the fridge example, I could set an announcing hook saying "fridge for sale". Someone setting a search hook for "fridge for sale" would be notified by my presence. Let's pretend that we are wearing glasses with built-in displays (that technology is available today). The glasses would display: "Fridge for sale: match".
Possibilities are endless. Even for spammers! The difference is that you actually SEE the spammer and can act on him (her) in the real world. What a revenge!!
12 Sep 2004 @ 20:41 by ming : Connections
It could change everything if we really could see the connections around us. I.e. the actual or potential matches, in accordance with our interest areas.
Like, the spammer example there. What if, when I walk by a house, it tells me that I've gotten 5732 unwanted messages that are aliases of the person who lives in that house. OK, that's a little difficult to figure out at this point, but suppose we could.
Or, I walk by a house, and I'm informed that here lives the owner of so-and-so big corporation. Or here lives somebody who donated 1/2 million dollars to the Republican National Committee. Or to a front group for Al Qaida.
OK, that's hard too. Hard to piece the data together. And there would be many potential problems and privacy issues. But the concept is, what if you could much better see what actually is around you, you could also much better take appropriate action. And, ultimately I think transparency would be the best direction to go.
That goes much further than the simple matching of offered and wanted items. But it is in the same realm of mapping information onto the physical context it applies to. Which clearly would help form connections that it would be desirable to form. More effectively than waiting for it to fall in your lap.
10 Mar 2005 @ 04:03 by Arthur Scott Varela @18.104.22.168 : A Factual Explanation of Synchronicity
The Website link I provided takes you to a free book I wrote that explains that there is another consciounsess that lives life with everybody that is organizing thing synchronized or timed together. The Timed Communication subject on the book explains the details that allows anybody to observe constant communication from the what some call sub conscious with them, mostly I term it sub consciousness-because it is a seperate conscious awareness. It is amazing to find out that it is the source of the thoughts and ideas we observe, our awareness is not coming up with any of it-it just seems like it. It is the source of all the Thoughts and Ideas we observe. Most do not realize the importance of the suggestion of basically memorizing the timed communication subject-because if you are not familiar enough with the list of words that they organize body movements on the left side of the body, and the list of words that they organize on the right side of the body, and also the lists of things observable-they your sub consciousness could cause you to observe something, and if not familiar enough you would not recognize that the observation is one of the things which is the indicator-of which you should stop and compare a word or phrase in the thoughts you observe, your speech, someone elses speech, words or phrases on the radio or television, and finally written words. send all inquiries, questions, and comments to the address of firstname.lastname@example.org
After reading some of Freuds, and Jungs writings, this is when I realized how much more accurately my sub consciousness has revealed reality. My writings are absolute reality-worded so that it is easy to comprehend-their writings are just theories that are difficult to understand and does not leave anyone with knowledge of the truthful functioning of the Human Brain, and the amazing Human Consciousness Situation.
From the Author Scott Varela
5 May 2005 @ 17:55 by sync_ron_icity @22.214.171.124 : coincidences
A matter of the timing and importance in the event, if any . .
Requires a positive open mind though, if you know what i mean.
19 Dec 2014 @ 19:10 by Baboloki @126.96.36.199 : mSMTIvqRDROBKUuDNf
To have one of those magical and loelvy days outside where the temperature is just right and the wind gusts by every now and then. And most importantly, to have the time to just enjoy it and live in that moment without any cares of the world seeping in just for a little bit.
23 Dec 2014 @ 12:45 by Tony @188.8.131.52 : KzuKXMOoreHtBRpeqlnO
I love it when this kind of thing happens. I love your csuncioos intention to intentionally create your wish without csuncioos action. Beautiful idea! I have a feeling this happens all the time- usually we just don't notice.
1 May 2016 @ 10:25 by Joyce @184.108.40.206 : kTYccyhWtpIJOxKI
I could read a book about this without finding such real-world apsorachep!
Other entries in Internet
10 Jul 2010 @ 13:01: Strong Elastic Links
13 Oct 2008 @ 14:42: Call for Papers: (Online) Conference On Systemic Flaws and Solutions 2009
25 Oct 2007 @ 21:47: Static or dynamic web metaphors
28 Mar 2007 @ 05:36: The Tyee - Vancouver's Online Newspaper
11 Jul 2006 @ 15:12: Response to Josep L.I. Ortega's Statement for Unity of Action
25 May 2006 @ 10:14: Squidoo lenses
8 Apr 2006 @ 23:44: Web2.0
10 Jan 2006 @ 22:55: Agora and Antigora
14 Dec 2005 @ 15:15: Ruby on Rails
19 Nov 2005 @ 14:12: Saving the net from the pipe owners