Maxims

15 Aug 2002 @ 17:51
Subject: Fw: Vaccination By Christine Colebeck

This information is very imporatant please read it and pass it on. I personally have seen the effects of vaccination as Jake had serious side effects and had to be revived many times and hospitalized as a little baby as a result of vaccination. The paedeatrition admitted to me at the time that Jake was suffering from the effects of the Vaccination, and if he died they would say that causse of death was SIDS.

Please consider the risks when vaccinating!!!

Regards
Raelene

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Christine Colebeck

Today is my daughter's sweet 16th birthday but we will not be celebrating. Instead I will light a candle and when I blow it out I will make a wish in my daughter's memory. My wish is for all mother's worldwide, that you will educate yourselves and that you make informed choices so that you may prevent unnecessary tragedy and be spared from my pain.

Laura's Story

After 41 weeks of pregnancy, on July 27th, 1986, a perfect and healthy little baby, Laura Marie, made her entrance into the world. We were welcomed home by family and friends anxiously waiting to meet the new family member. They showered her with so many beautiful, little tiny, pink dresses, we joked that she would never be able to wear them all in one lifetime.

Our lives changed completely and now revolved around stroller walks in the park, visiting friends, changing diapers, night feedings and shopping for more little pink dresses. We were parents now, we had a family and life was absolutely perfect.

I took Laura for several baby check-ups at the paediatrician. She was a kind and gentle older woman. At 3 months old, the paediatrician was very pleased with Laura's development and weight gain and vaccinated her with DPT OPV. I didn't even question her, I knew that all my friend's babies had this same vaccine and "all good mothers" vaccinated their children to protect them. I left the paediatrician’s office and walked home.

Laura was very fussy, which was unusual. She was crying loudly all the way home in the stroller. When we got home, I realized she had urinated so heavily she wet everything in the stroller. Then her cry turned into screaming and she developed a fever, her leg was very swollen and red, and felt hot. I called the paediatrician who told me this was "normal" and to give her Tempra. I gave her baby Tempra and I felt better, the paediatrician had assured me this was normal.

Laura continued to scream and I could no longer console her. My every instinct told me this was not normal but I was young with my first child and trusted the doctor. I could not hold Laura in my arms because she screamed louder as any movement of her leg seemed to cause her terrible pain. I put her in the swing and she cried herself to sleep. I was so relieved, the Tempra was working and the doctor must have been right. I began to feel silly for all my worrying. A short time later, Laura woke up screaming and spent the evening screaming and sleeping on and off.

She had no appetite and nothing made her stop crying. Finally it was bedtime and she cried in her crib, until she fell asleep. She had never cried herself to sleep before and I felt very bad for letting her but if I held her, she screamed louder. My husband came home from work and I told him about everything that had happened that day. Laura was sleeping soundly in her crib and we were both relieved that she seemed to be feeling better and decided not to worry... I should have worried.

In the morning I awoke and was startled to realize my husband had slept in for work. I immediately knew something was wrong and the worry from the previous night came rushing back to me. I quickly ran to her crib, with a feeling of dread. She did not look right. I closed my eyes tight and opened them again, and considered the possibility that this was a dream, but when I opened my eyes she looked dead.

I went into shock and after that, much of this day remains a blur. I touched her and she was very warm. I screamed for my husband to call 911.

I watched as he performed CPR, my body was frozen and I couldn't move. He tried to revive our child to no avail. He was shouting for me to open the door for the paramedics, I was temporarily jolted back to reality and I went and opened the door. I could now move but couldn't speak. I just stood there numbly shaking my head, feeling completely helpless as dozens of paramedics, police and firemen rushed past me into our home. I didn't cry, and I wanted to scream at them to leave her alone but I couldn't speak. She was on the floor and they were shocking her tiny body, in the little bedroom with the yellow painted walls and clown wallpaper. I stood there praying in my head that they would just leave her alone, that they would get out of her bedroom and that I would wake up from this horrible dream.

Then I heard someone saying there was a faint pulse and I suddenly felt hopeful. She was rushed from the house in an ambulance. It was then that the homicide detectives led us into another room and the interrogation began.

They decided that my husband and I needed to be questioned in separate rooms. I immediately realized they suspected that we had done this to our child. We all know that perfect children do not suddenly die for no reason. I was silent, I had already decided in my own mind that this was somehow all my fault and although I wasn't quite sure what I had done to kill her, I was convinced that I had somehow caused this to happen. Perhaps, I was being punished by god for a sin or perhaps it happened because I had let her cry herself to sleep that night. The fact remained that my child was dead and "good mothers" do not have dead children.

My husband began to protest loudly about the line of questioning and he demanded we be taken immediately to the hospital, to see our child. The detectives finally took us to the hospital and put us in the "bad news room." The doctor came and insisted we sit down before he spoke to us. He began telling us that they had tried this and that and then finally he said the words that would echo in my ears for a lifetime:

"She is dead."

The paediatrician whom I so respected and adored broke down and cried when I gave her the news on the phone. She went back and forth defending the vaccine that she was told was safe, and blaming it for killing my child and those who told her it was safe.

She then told me that she also had another patient, an infant boy, die after this same vaccination.

Then the detectives took us home for more questions, often repeating the same questions several times until they grew tired of asking them. The questions constantly centred around our involvement, then they searched the house and checked for signs of forced entry. My husband repeatedly told them that he thought the vaccine had killed our child and told them over and over about her unusual behaviour since she was vaccinated.

Everyone we knew arrived at our house. I made coffee and tidied the house, like it was any other day and we were having "guests". Shock is a strange and wonderful thing and of course you don't know you are in it.

My parents finally insisted on taking me to their house for a few days, while my husband and his friends had the horrendous task of packing up the nursery because I couldn't stand to look at it any longer. The room I had so lovingly made was now empty and a source of great pain.

Several days later, after the funeral and the tiny white coffin that was so small my husband carried it alone, I finally came out of shock and allowed myself to cry a river. I cried for all the things I would never do with my daughter. All the ballet classes I would never take her to, the wedding I would never attend, the grandchildren I would never know and all the dreams I would never realize with her. I cried for all that was and all that would never be. There was an emptiness inside of me that threatened to swallow me up whole, as I fell into the depths of grief during the darkest days of my life.

The detectives eventually became satisfied that we had not harmed our daughter in any way and the investigation into her death ended. We were then left without answers.

The doctors did not want to talk about her death being related in any way to the vaccine and, one after the other, refused to answer our many questions. I was repeatedly told that vaccines were for "the greater good." I was even told that loss of life through immunization was "expected" in the war against disease but these losses were considered to be at "acceptable" levels. However, this did not feel very acceptable or good to me as a mother with empty arms that ached for my child. The coroner finally told us months later that the cause of death was determined to be "SIDS" (sudden infant death syndrome), meaning "no known cause," and refused to release a copy of the autopsy report to us.

It took almost a year for us to obtain this report and to our great horror, we realized that the autopsy summery was copied directly from the vaccine product monograph under the heading "Contraindications" as follows:

"Sudden infant death syndrome has been reported following administration of
vaccines containing Diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and pertussis vaccine. However, the significance of these reports is not clear. One common factor is the age where primary immunization was done between the age of 2 to 6 months, a period where most sudden infant death syndromes are found to occur with a peak incidence being at 2 to 4 months."

There was no toxicology testing performed and the paediatrician never filed an adverse vaccine reaction report with health authorities. I later learned that most vaccine-induced deaths in this country are listed as SIDS and SIDS statistics are NOT included in vaccine adverse reaction data, even if a child dies only a few hours after receiving inoculation. This data is presented to physicians and the public to reassure them that vaccines are safe.

The government's own literature advises that there has been little or no testing in the area of vaccine safety or efficacy. Essentially, our children are the test. According to their literature, immunization is "the most cost effective" way to prevent disease. Nowhere in their literature does it claim to be the safest. We are trading our children's lives to save the government money. We are told that the benefits outweigh the risks but many of the diseases that we vaccinate for are not even life threatening; however, the vaccine itself has the potential to kill.

Vaccines kill at a much higher rate than we are led to believe. We play vaccine roulette with our children's lives and we never know which child will fall victim next.

If the odds are 1 in 500 thousand for death, 1 in 100 thousand for permanent brain injury, 1 in 1700 for seizures and convulsions or one in 100 for adverse reaction, are you willing to take that chance? Are any odds acceptable enough to convince you to gamble with your child's life?

I can assure you that death from vaccination is neither quick nor painless. I helplessly watched my daughter suffer an excruciatingly slow death as she screamed and arched her back in pain, while the vaccine did as it was intended to do and assaulted her immature immune system. The poisons used as preservatives seeped through her tiny body, overwhelming her vital organs one by one until they collapsed. It is an image that will haunt me forever and I hope no other parent ever has to witness it.

A death sentence considered too inhumane for this county's most violent criminals was handed down to my beautiful, innocent, infant daughter, death by lethal injection.

Today, on my daughter's birthday, I will grieve not only for the loss of my own child but for all the innocent children for which the benefits of vaccines do not outweigh the risks and are unnecessarily sentenced to death by lethal injection, under the guise of "the greater good." The true war is not against disease; we have somehow become our own worst enemy by putting our faith in science instead of nature. Today, I call on all mothers across the world to join me in putting an end to this senseless slaughter of our most precious resource, our children.

Response from Dawn Richardson, President, PROVE

Dear PROVE Members

I am forwarding this … as a tribute to baby Laura and all the other children who have been injured or killed by a vaccine so that parents can learn another side to the vaccine story.

When I was almost 8 months pregnant with one of my daughters, I had volunteered to go to the Travis County Morgue with Karin Schumacher who, for years before she went to Law School, ran the NVIC news-list. Karin asked me to help her go through autopsy reports of infants listed as SIDS deaths and look at vaccination information. I will never forget the experience. We sat there in this basement buried in infant autopsy reports as my own baby kicked and turned inside of me.

Here were two of our observations:

1) A highly disproportionate amount of SIDS deaths clustered at 2, 4, and 6 months -- which are the very times infants are vaccinated. If vaccines had nothing to do with these, the numbers should have been randomly spread throughout the first 6 months of life. Not so. I challenge the naysayers to go to any morgue in the country and to be honest and see what I'm talking about.

2) It was shocking at how rare it was for the vaccine information to be recorded and how little investigating into the cause of death of these babies was actually done. It floored me that the when the vaccine information was even mentioned, it was often so incomplete. Medical examiners routinely missed asking for this indispensable information and failed to note the correlation of the date when the child died to even raise the question.

One of the things that struck me when reading Christine's story … is that here we are 16 years later and so many doctors are still downplaying and denying the risks of vaccines and healthy babies are still dying after being vaccinated.

One of the most offensive things that Senator Frist has in his vaccine bill which shields the drug companies from all liability when a vaccine injures or kills someone is that he is proposing that the federal government increase the amount of money that a parent receives from the government compensation program when their child is killed by a vaccine. Parents are not willing to be bought off with this blood money. Elected officials like Frist who want to eliminate the financial responsibility of the drug companies all together and throw the bone to parents that the government will pay them more if the government mandated vaccine kills their kid need to be voted out of Congress. If you haven't sent your email notes to your senators to oppose S 2053 yet - PLEASE do! If drug companies have ZERO threat of liability, the one thing we can be certain of is that stories like [Laura's] will become far more common.

The key to change is education. Fortunately, the Internet allows parents to educate parents. Please stop for a quiet moment after reading the note and say a prayer for all the babies whose lives were ended before they even got a chance to really start … and then take the time to forward this on to other parents.

Sincerely, Dawn Richardson President, PROVE

Senator Frist's Vaccine Bill S 2053

DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT:

document.write("E-mail to a friend" ); E-mail to a friend

I strongly urge you to forward this particular piece to everyone -- parents, expecting parents, women in their childbearing years, and anyone who may know such individuals - and ask them to forward it on, too. One of the greatest powers of the Internet is that we can spread important information quickly; another is that we are not (yet!) restricted from doing so by government or corporate bodies.

Laura's tragic story is, sadly, anything but new. For years, as you can see via the links below or by searching on Mercola.com, I have warned against vaccines, as have other credentialed physicians. The good they may do is overwhelmed by the harm they inflict, from the trauma of being stuck with endless needles to inflicting the very disease they are supposed to guard against to, as this story shows, death.

There are alternate and vastly safer methods that all begin with a truly healthy diet as outlined in my Eating Plan; of course, drug manufacturers and the government they have purchased don't want you to believe that the foods you consume and the habits you adopt are the primary solution to establishing immunity to diseases and living longer. They want you to believe that their pharmaceuticals, including vaccines, are essential to your existence, and your children's.

Their wealth relies on your dependency, and so they will do everything to crush the notion of "natural" - meaning they don't profit from it, and you take back the control - health. They will spend three billion dollars this year alone in advertisements for their pharmaceuticals, preying on unsuspecting consumers' hopes and fears with these carefully crafted campaigns. Apparently, they will not even stop at killing our children to feed their greed.

Again, I encourage you to check out the links below, and to use the powerful search feature on Mercola.com, using terms such as "vaccine" or "pharmaceutical manufacturer," to find out how the traditional medical establishment is putting your life and the lives of those you love at risk -- and how to take back your health. More >

Maybe Mugabe is not Mad (Just Bad),

2 comments

31 Jul 2002 @ 23:41
Food stocks are running out across Southern Africa:
by March 2003 the numbers of people facing starvation will be:
6 million in Zimbabwe/3.2 m. in Malawi/2.4 m. in Zambia/over .5 m. in
Mozambique
MORE INFO: [link]
DONATE NOW! [link]
---
"It is highly unethical not to just cover the costs for milling," said
Thompson, the Arizona professor. "Tell me how much it costs to drop one
bomb on Afghanistan. Who is starving whom here?"
---
[link]
Starved for Food, Zimbabwe Rejects U.S. Biotech Corn
Washington Post
By Rick Weiss
July 31, 2002

Thousands of tons of U.S. emergency food aid destined for crisis-stricken
Zimbabwe has been diverted to other countries, and a new shipload may be
diverted within days, because the donations include genetically modified
corn that the Zimbabwean government does not want to accept.

The image of a nation on the brink of starvation turning down food
because it has been genetically engineered has reignited a
long-smoldering scientific and political controversy over the risks and
benefits of gene-altered food.

Some biotech advocates are criticizing the Zimbabwean government for
balking at the humanitarian assistance, saying President Robert Mugabe
seems to care more about his political independence than his citizens'
lives. About half of Zimbabwe's 12 million residents are on the verge of
famine because of drought and political mismanagement, according to the
United Nations.

But other scientists and economists say the troubled African nation has
good reason to reject the engineered kernels. If some of the corn seeds
are sown instead of eaten, the resulting plants will produce gene-altered
pollen that will blow about and contaminate surrounding fields.

That could render much of the corn grown in Zimbabwe -- a nation that in
most years is a major exporter -- unshippable to nations in Europe and
elsewhere that restrict imports of bioengineered food, because of
environmental and health concerns.

The United States could save lives and avert a potential ecological
crisis by paying to have the corn kernels milled before they enter
Zimbabwe, several experts said this week. But relief officials said U.S.
food agencies typically don't cover milling expenses, which are
estimated at $25 per metric ton -- a significant expense for a nation so
poor.

That response has fueled suspicion among some observers in the United
States and Africa that Washington is using the food crisis to get U.S.
gene-altered products established in a corner of the world that has
largely resisted them.

"The U.S. is using its power to impose its view that modified maize is
not a danger," said Carol Thompson, a political economist at Northern
Arizona University in Flagstaff, who has spent much of the past 10 years
in Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe and five other southern African nations -- Lesotho, Malawi,
Mozambique, Swaziland and Zambia -- face widespread food shortages after
two years of drought and floods. The U.N. World Food Program has said the
region will need 1 million metric tons of food aid in the next few
months, Only a fraction of that amount has been promised by donors so far.

The first shipload of U.S. food aid for Zimbabwe -- a landlocked nation
that is the hardest hit of the affected countries -- arrived at a
Tanzanian port in June. It was carrying about 10,000 metric tons of corn
from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

But the corn, which in Africa is known as maize and is valued by agencies
at about $95 a metric ton, was not welcome. Like most corn stores in the
United States, the shipment was a mix of conventional varieties and
high-tech kernels bearing bacterial genes to protect against insect pests.

The Zimbabwean government, which for decades has supported the
development of corn varieties suited to local ecosystems, is concerned
not only about genetic contamination, but also about intellectual
property issues. Pending changes in international trade rules, backed by
the United States, could preclude farmers from saving the patented seeds
from biotech harvests for replanting in following years, a practice
vital to many subsistence farmers who cannot afford to buy new seed
every year.

"If these crops get in, then farmers basically lose their rights to their
own agricultural resources," said Carole Collins, senior policy analyst
for the Washington-based Africa Faith and Justice Network.

Moreover, some European countries want to ban imports of cattle that have
been fed engineered corn, posing another potential trade problem for
Zimbabwe if engineered kernels were to swamp the country.

When notified of the June shipment, officials told the United Nations
that, although the country was not absolutely rejecting the aid, it
preferred that the corn be milled first so no seeds could be planted.

That response got to the U.N. two days after World Food Program officials
decided to unload the kernels and ship them to Malawi, said Judith Lewis,
the program's regional director for southern and eastern Africa. Malawi
is among the poorest of southern African nations and does not have a firm
policy on gene-altered food.

Now a second ship of Zimbabwe-bound U.S. corn has arrived, this time in
the South African port of Durban. It includes 17,500 metric tons of corn
kernels, and USAID wants a decision from Zimbabwe by tomorrow, Lewis
said. Zimbabwean officials discussed their options yesterday without
reaching a decision, and were scheduled to have further meetings today.

USAID representatives have expressed frustration with this and previous
situations like it. When India balked over a humanitarian shipment of
gene-altered food, one U.S. official was quoted as saying, "Beggars can't
be choosers."

At a news conference in Johannesburg on Friday, Roger Winter, USAID's
assistant administrator for humanitarian assistance, suggested that
Zimbabwe had little choice if it wanted to feed its people. "We have no
substitute for that maize. That maize is what's available," he said.

Indeed, very little nonengineered corn is segregated from high-tech
varieties during the U.S. harvest, and that portion sells at a premium to
organic food processors and others.

Per Pinstrup-Andersen, director general of the International Food Policy
Research Institute, a Washington-based nongovernmental organization, said
Zimbabwe was using the food to play politics.

"I think the Zimbabwe government is using this to show its muscle against
the United States and other Western countries because of the criticism
the president has been receiving from outside," Pinstrup-Andersen said,
referring to widespread criticism of Mugabe's recent land-reform policies
and accusations of government cronyism. "I think it is irresponsible . .
. unless they know they can get enough food from elsewhere that is not
genetically modified."

Mugabe has said he is being prudent. "We fight the present drought with
our eyes clearly set on the future of the agricultural sector, which is
the mainstay of our economy," he told Zimbabwe's parliament on July 23.
"We dare not endanger its future through misplaced decisions based on
acts of either desperation or expediency."

Neil E. Harl, a professor of economics at Iowa State University, agreed
that much was at stake. "Pollen drift is a real problem, especially with
maize," Harl said. "It places these countries in an extremely difficult
position."

He and several other experts recommended that the United States pay for
milling costs. "It is highly unethical not to just cover the costs for
milling," said Thompson, the Arizona professor. "Tell me how much it
costs to drop one bomb on Afghanistan. Who is starving whom here?"

Asked if people were going "too far" by saying that gene-altered
humanitarian exports were part of a strategy to spread the crops around
the world, Harl said: "I'm not sure that is going too far."

U.S. government and biotech representatives vehemently denied any such
collusion.

"I don't think there is any justification to make claims like that," said
Rob Horsch, director of global technology transfer for Monsanto, the St.
Louis biotech giant that owns the rights to many biotech crop varieties.
Although the company has used private detectives to identify and
prosecute U.S. and Canadian farmers it suspects of saving patented
seeds, that policy would be adapted to accommodate local traditions in other
countries, Horsch said.

USAID officials also rejected the notion that they were strong-arming
Zimbabwe or had any agenda other than feeding the needy.

With food shortages increasing every day, some U.S. officials said late
yesterday that they believed Zimbabwe was on the verge of accepting the
corn. More >

A cloud with another color (reflections on a tragedy)

5 comments

10 Jun 2002 @ 18:55
A Cloud with another Colour

Still here and in a process of establishing my office at home and doing away with the need to commute or deal with any client or situation that I don’t feel comfortable with. Really did learn a little these last few years about integrity (or rather the lack of it as one climbs the corporate ladder) and how people will die and return from the dead or just stay dead if 'face' requires this. Life has its twists and turns; I have managed to seek out some truly grand life lessons to process. My travels took me to www.democrate.com and there I spotted talk of impeachment and couldn't help but recall my earlier comments to you. Wait a little longer and watch what happens in these next months. There is a moment in the ebb and flow of history when all is again possible and the great sickness of endless abuse in its every sense, is finally exorcised and we find what it is to dwell in peace and prosperity as civilized beings can and will, the winner takes all vibration is seen as a limiting thing rather than a facilitating energy. Humans are only truly successful when they willingly cooperate (the mighty dollar only enslaves us otherwise). It is only through the identification of essential goodness that we discover health and the joy that healthy life is."Tis only ever an illusive dream of madness that here on earth is heaven a state to embrace right now!, the fall out from the BUllSHit burning down when the president and his hawkish supporters are revealed as manipulative ********** who deserve to be publicly paraded in stocks and have all manner of foul rotting fruits and veggies thrown at them until finally they are broken and the evil dream is exorcised for the benefit of us all!! Did I not tell you there would be a better answer if we looked inwardly and asked who benefits from this? IT IS FATHER AND SON AND THE UNHOLY GHOST OF WAR AND TORTURE, RAPE AND PILLAGE. A war on terrorism indeed, an endless bout of shadow boxing that the sleeping continent must escape by a collective awakening, the enemy from outside is most feared because they are little understood. However the enemy within, identified, may in the end prove more powerful in the healing of great sickness than all else, for why else did so many need to be sacrificed for this great catharsis. Digital technology can number us and then control, or empower us AS WE ALLOW. I trust the slaves can be set free through simple nutrition and wise life habit, it is a journey of magnificence and celebration, that is worthy of our divine creator heart energy or it will remain an endless drudgery as we choose!! I prefer joy and light, so I send you all a sense of my delight!
Max More >

More of the same ?

0 comments

17 Mar 2002 @ 03:02
Subject: 9-11: The Flight Of The Bumble Planes > > 9-11: The Flight Of The Bumble Planes > > by Snake Plissken > as told to Carol A. Valentine > Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum > http:www.Public-Action.com > Copyright, March 2002 > May be reproduced for non-commercial purposes > See [link] > To hear the bumble planes, visit above URL > > March 10, 2002 -- Eureka! One of my readers, who calls himself > "Snake Plissken," has put it together. He tells us why the passenger > lists of the four September 11 "suicide" jets were so small, how > remote control was used, why the transponders were turned off, why > the radar tracks of the four planes were confused, why there was no > Boeing 757 debris at the Pentagon ... > > By George, I think he's got it! > > My e-mail exchanges with Snake took place over a series of days. > With Snake's agreement, I have consolidated the exchanges, inserted > some reference URLs, and made minor edits. My comments and additions > will be bracketed thus [ ]. As you read what Snake has to say, keep > the following in mind: > > "Magic is the pretended performance of those things which cannot be > done. The success of a magician's simulation of doing the impossible > depends upon misleading the minds of his audiences. This, in the > main, is done by adding, to a performance, details of which the > spectators are unaware, and leaving out others which they believe you > have not left out. In short a performance of magic is largely a > demonstration of the universal reliability of certain facts of > psychology." (John Mulholland, "The Art of Illusion," Charles > Scribner & Sons, 1944.) > > In what follows, Snake unravels the illusions of the 9-11 magicians. > > === > > Carol, > > You did some fine research on 9-11. You came within inches of > solving the puzzle of the "suicide" jets, and now you need the rest > of the story. Let me explain by making a suggestion. > > Go visit a bumblebee hive some time, and try to keep your eye on just > one bee. You can't do it. You get confused. Think of the 9-11 > jets as bumblebees. Matter of fact, you could even call Operation > 911 "Flight of the Bumble Planes." > > I've worked in cryptology and there are many ways of hiding the > truth. Substitute information, omit information, scramble the > information out of sequence, and add nonsense (random garbage). All > four methods were used on the 9-11 incident. Let me lay out the > clues and show you where they lead. > > THE CLUES > > * First Clue -- Few Passengers On The Four Flights: Many have > remarked about the short passenger lists on the four 911 jets. You > might get a low turnout for a 767 or 757 now and then, but four > coast-to-coast flights taking off from the East inside of a few > minutes of each other, all with short passenger lists? Nuts. That's > your first clue. > > * Second Clue -- First Report of First WTC Crash: The second clue > comes from the first New York eyewitness on NBC. She had no question > about what she saw. You could hear it in her voice. If she was the > state's witness, the defense team would have their heads between > their knees before she stopped talking. > > What did she say? She heard an airplane coming in low and looked up. > She saw a small private jet, and watched it fly into the first WTC > tower, the North tower. She was certain in her description -- most > people know the difference between a big round-nose commercial jet > and a smaller plane. > > [ CV cmments: > [ In his testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on > October 25, 2001, NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart said of the first > September 11 report: "We were told it was a light commuter airplane. > It didn't look like that was caused by a light commuter airplane." > [ [link] > [ [link] ] > > Later, some dodgy report came in from an anonymous source in the > "United Airlines Command Center" that American Airlines had a > hijacking, and they gradually padded the story out until the viewer > felt like he was part of an unfolding revelation on the size and make > of the plane. So the first eyewitness's story got shellacked. > > * Third clue -- Pentagon Crash: The first report on NBC said there > had been an explosion near the Pentagon heliport. No mention of a > plane. > > If you were watching ABC, the first reports cited eyewitnesses who > said a business jet had crashed into the Pentagon. Notice that this > description is similar to the first report about the WTC. A small > plane, not a big, round nosed passenger jet. > > Then ABC interviewed some media executive who said he "saw the whole > thing" from his car on the freeway. It was an American Airlines > passenger jet. Good luck the road didn't need his attention while he > was gawking. And of course it was a big passenger jet scraping the > light poles with it's belly as it came in low. And that story paved > the way for the official truth. > > * Fourth Clue -- No Boeing 757 Debris at Pentagon Crash Site. By now > lots of people have realized there is something very wrong with the > story of Flight 77's crash into the Pentagon. What's the problem? > The wingspan of a 757 is about 125 feet, with about 35 feet between > the two jet engines. > > [ [link] > [ [link] > > The hole left by whatever hit the building was 70 feet across. > > [ US News & World Report, December 10, 2001, pg. 31 > [

> > After the smoke died down, everyone could see the Pentagon but no one > could see the plane. The Pentagon is made of masonry -- limestone -- > not steel and glass. The aluminum wings of the plane should have > been ripped off and left outside the building. We should have seen > wing wreckage. But there was none. > > [ CV comments: > [ I have studied TV footage taken contemporaneously by various > networks and reviewed photos from news magazines published just after > 9-11. After the smoke died down, no Boeing 757 debris was visible. > > [ See the following URLs at the website of the U.S. Army Military > District of Washington, D.C., sent to me by researcher John DiNardo, > . By the way, Mr. DiNardo suspects that > inside explosives were used at the Pentagon on 9-11. Certainly the > damaged section of the building had just been renovated; explosives > would have been easy to install. ] > > [ [link] > [ [link] > > [ [link] > [ [link] > > [ [link] damaged.html > [ [link] ] > > [The scenes depicted by the US Army photos are consistent with > contemporaneously published photos in the popular press. See, for > example, US News and World Report, September 14, 2001, pg. 40. > > [

> [ and the photo that appeared in Newsweek's 2001 "Extra" edition, pgs. 26, 27. > [

> > [ This photograph below, with caption, appeared on the US Army > Military District of Washington site. It unwittingly demonstrates > that there was no Boeing 757 wreckage. Think now: a hundred thousand > pounds of seats, framework, skin plates, engine parts, flaps, wheels, > luggage, interior panels, electronics, and this little out-of-context > scrap of God-knows what was shown by the Pentagon. > [link] > [link] > > [ In the last several months, largely as a result of Mr. DiNardo's > work, there has been growing Internet discussion of the lack of > Boeing 757 debris outside the Pentagon. Now, magically, new photos > of "Boeing 757" Pentagon wreckage are beginning to appear. Check out > the websites of Mike Rivero and Joe Vialls > for copies of these fakes. Rivero and Vialls, by endorsing them as > real, have surely identified themselves as members of the fake > opposition. > > [ OK. Now back to Snake Plissken] > > * Fifth Clue -- Quality of Pilots in Pentagon crash: As you point out > > [ Operation 911: NO SUICIDE PILOTS, [link] > action.com/911/robotplane.html ] > > the flying instructors who trained the "suicide" pilots of Flight 77 > said they were hopeless. "It was like they had hardly even ever > driven a car ..." The flight instructors called the two, "dumb and > dumber," and told them to quit taking lessons. > > Yet the Washington Post described the maneuvers of Flight 77 before > it hit the Pentagon. The huge jet took a 270 degree hairpin turn to > make its target. The Post said Flight 77 had to be flown by expert > pilots. > > Something is wrong here. Now "dumb and dumber" are expert pilots. > That is your fifth clue. > > * Sixth Clue -- Transponders Turned Off: As you point out, the > "hijackers" turned off the transponders which transmit information > showing the airline names, flight numbers, and altitude. But the FAA > also uses conventional radar, so the "hijackers" must have known the > planes were still visible. Why would the "hijackers" shut the > transponders off, you asked? You are looking at your sixth clue. > > ["Did NORAD Send The 'Suicide' Jets?" Part 1 > [ [link] ] > > * Seventh Clue -- Confusion On Radar Tracks: As you point out, some > of these flights disappeared from the conventional radar scopes. > [See above-cited URL.] That's your seventh clue. > > * Eighth Clue -- Second WTC Tower Barely Hit: Have a look at the > footage of the second WTC tower being hit. The plane almost missed > the tower and just managed to hit the corner. Yet the first plane > struck its target dead center. That's your eighth clue. > > [ See diagrams from Wag the WTC website at: > [ [link] Action.com/911/psyopnews/Extra/1/southtowerpath.jpg > > HERE'S WHAT HAPPENED > > * A Boeing 767 was secured and painted up to look like a United > Airlines jet. It had remote controls installed in it, courtesy of > some NORAD types. Call that plane "Pseudo Flight 175" and leave it > parked at a military airfield for the moment. > > * The number of the passengers on each flight was kept artificially > low that day. Easy to do. Just monkey with the airline computers > and show the fights full so no more tickets are sold. Include some > of your own operatives in each flight, maybe. > > * After the planes are in the air, the transponders must be shut > down. There are a few ways to do this, maybe, but the simplest is > this: Have one of the NORAD insiders call the pilots and say: "This > is the North American Aerospace Defense Command. There is a national > emergency. We are under terrorist attack. Turn off your > transponders. Maintain radio silence. Here is your new flight plan. > You will land at [name] military air base." > > * The pilots turn off the transponders. The FAA weenies lose the > information which identifies the airline, the flight number, and the > altitude of the planes. Of course the planes can still be seen on > conventional radar, but the planes are just nameless blips now. > > * What did the radar show of the planes' flight paths? We'll never > see the real records, for sure. But in the spy movies, when the spy > wants to lose a tail, he gets a double to lead the tail one way while > the spy goes the other. If I were designing Operation 911, I'd do > that: As each of the original jets is flying, another jet is sent to > fly just above or below it, at the same latitude and longitude. The > blips of the two planes merge on the radar scopes. Alternately, a > plane is sent to cross the flight path of the original plane. Again, > the blips merge, just like the little bees you're watching outside > the hive. The original planes proceed to the military airfield and > air traffic control is thoroughly confused, watching the wrong blips > ... > > That's probably close to the way it was managed. Like I say, we'll > never see the radar records so we won't know exactly. > > [ For the alleged flight paths of the four jets, see > [ [link] > [ For names and locations of military airfields in the US, try > [ [link] > [ You can search for a listing of bases in 9-11 related states by > using the search engine.] > > * A small remote controlled commuter jet filled with > incendiaries/explosives -- a cruise missile, if you like -- is flown > into the first WTC tower. That's the plane the first NBC eyewitness > saw. > > * The remote controlled "Pseudo Flight 175," decked out to look like > a United airlines passenger jet, is sent aloft and flown by remote > control - without passengers -- and crashed into the second tower. > Beautiful! Everyone has pictures of that. > > Why did Pseudo Flight 175 almost miss the second tower? Because the > remote operators were used to smaller, more maneuverable craft, not a > big stubborn passenger jet. The operators brought the jet in on a > tight circle and almost blew it because those jets do hairpin turns > like the Queen Mary. They brought it in too fast and too close to do > the job right and just hit the corner of the tower. > > * Then another remote controlled commuter jet filled with > incendiaries/explosives -- a cruise missile if you like -- hits the > Pentagon, in the name of Flight 77. > > * Eyewitnesses are a dime a dozen. Trusted media whores "witness" > the Pentagon hit and claim it was an American Airlines Boeing 757, > Flight 77. Reporters lie better than lawyers. > > * Meanwhile, the passengers from Flights 11, 175, and 77, now at the > military airfield, are loaded onto Flight 93. If you've put some of > your own agents aboard, they stay on the ground, of course. > > * Flight 93 is taken aloft. > > * Flight 93 is shot down or bombed -- makes no difference which. > Main deal is to destroy that human meat without questions. Easiest > way to dispose of 15,000 lbs. of human flesh, and nobody gets a > headline if they find a foot in their front garden. No mass graves > will ever be discovered, either. > > * The trail is further confused by issuing reports that Flight 77 was > actually headed towards the White House but changed its course. > > * The trail is further confused by having The Washington Post wax > lyrical about the flying skills of non-existent pilots on a > non-existence plane (Flight 77). > > * The trail is further confused with conflicting reports and > artificial catfight issues, such as -- did The Presidential Shrub > really see the first tower hit on TV while he was waiting to read the > story about the pet goat ... > > So we know the Boeing that used to be Flight 93 was blown up. The > other three original Boeings (Flights 11, 175, 77) still exist > somewhere, unless they were cut up for scrap. > > The passengers and crews of Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93 died in an > airplane crash, just like the newspapers said. Only for most of > them, it was the wrong crash. But that's as close to the truth as > the news media likes to get anyway, so it works. > > WHY DO IT THAT WAY? > > So there you have it. Not four planes. More than fourJî

Check Mate Mr Bush!

4 comments

10 Mar 2002 @ 03:30
Dick Eastman

Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:36:28 -0800
From: "Dick Eastman" - eastman@compwrx.com
To: "VICE PRESIDENT OF U.S." - vice.president@whitehouse.gov

I've been thinking, based on all the images in the French site,
[link] ,
that there probably only three crashbomb airliners in the frame-up plan;
that the plane that went down in Ohio was the only plane
meant for the Pentagon, the only one meant for Washington D.C.;
and when it failed to get there (there are compeating plausible
theories why it did not reach its target -- they are irrelevant to this
point) the managers of the frame-up operation chose to set off
the the planted charges to blow up the targeted section of the
Pentagon (pro-sovereignty Naval Intelligence, maybe?) not wanting
the unused planted charges to be discovered and used as evidence
of a conspiracy -- the frame-up planner/managers knowing that with
Wolfowitzand Rumsfeld in charge of a building and surroundings that
are usually top secret and with witnesses reasonalbe
probability of success in the deception (especially when they can
count on their control of the major media monopoly and national-
security powers -- not to mention psy-ops capability -- -- to bluff on
the airly tale existence of a "fourth" hijacked aircraft.

This would mean that a recent story of a D.C. gas station security
camera capturing the plane crash -- which no one has seen
-- is part of the disinformation bluff -- certainly the CIA would
have a presence or a capability at a strategically placed gas
station across the street from the Pentagon ! -- the lie
about confiscated video footage being disinformation
to anchor the false idea that "A tape exists it has been
confiscated and is not being released, isn't that a shame etc.)

If all this is true

This would mean that the establishment are bunglers -- as
we would expect from spoiled rich kids who hire Kissinger and
Brzezinski and think they are getting brains. == And thisA TIMELINE SURROUNDING
SEPTEMBER 11TH - IF CIAAND THE GOVERNMENT WEREN'T INVOLVED IN THE SEPTEMBER 11
ATTACKS WHAT WERE THEY DOING?

Bin Laden Met with the CIA in July and Walked Away

by Michael C. Ruppert (see his www.copvcia.com) FTW, November 2, 2001 -
1200 PST -- On October 31, the French daily Le
Figaro dropped a bombshell. While in a Dubai hospital receiving
treatment for a chronic kidney infection last July, Osama bin Laden met
with a top CIA official - presumably the Chief of Station. The meeting,
held in bin Laden's private suite, took place at the American hospital
in Dubai at a time when he was a wanted fugitive for the bombings of two
U.S. embassies and this year's attack on the U.S.S. Cole. Bin Laden was
eligible for execution according to a 2000 intelligence finding issued
by President Bill Clinton before leaving office in January. Yet on July
14th he was allowed to leave Dubai on a private jet and there were no
Navy fighters waiting to force him down.

In 1985 Oliver North - the only member of the Reagan-Bush years who
doesn't appear to have a hand in the current war - sent the Navy and
commandos after terrorists on the cruise ship Achille Lauro. In his 1991
autobiography "Under Fire," while describing terrorist Abu Abbas, North
wrote, "I used to wonder: how many dead Americans will it take before we
do something?" One could look at the number of Americans Osama bin Laden
is alleged to have killed before September 11 and ask the same question.

It gets worse, much worse. A more complete timeline listing crucial
events both before and after the September 11th suicide attacks, which
have been blamed on bin Laden, establishes CIA foreknowledge of them and
strongly suggests that there was criminal complicity on the part of the
U.S. government in their execution. It also makes clear that the events
which have taken place since September 11th are based upon an agenda
that has little to do with the attacks.

One wonders how these events could have been ignored by the major media
or treated as isolated incidents. Failing that, how could skilled news
agencies avoid being outraged, or at least even just a little
suspicious?

1. 1991-1997 - Major U.S. oil companies including ExxonMobil, Texaco,
Unocal, BP Amoco and Shell directly invest almost $3 billion in cash
bribing heads of state in Kazakhstan to secure equity rights in the huge
oil reserves in these regions. The oil companies further commit to
future direct investments in Kazakhstan of $35 billion. Not being
willing to pay exorbitant prices to Russia to use Russian pipelines the
major oil companies have no way to recoup their investments. [Sources
Testimony before the House International Relations Committee 2/12/98]

2. December 4, 1997 - Representatives of the Taliban are invited guests
to the Texas headquarters of Unocal to negotiate their support for the
pipeline. Subsequent reports will indicate that the negotiations failed,
allegedly because the Taliban wanted too much money. [Source: The BBC,
Dec. 4, 1997]

3. February 12, 1998 - Unocal Vice President John J. Maresca - later to
become a Special Ambassador to Afghanistan - testifies before the House
that until a single, unified, friendly government is in place in
Afghanistan the trans-Afghani pipeline needed to monetize the oil will
not be built. [Source: Testimony before the House International
Relations Committee.]

4. 1998 - The CIA ignores warnings from Case Officer Robert Baer that
Saudi Arabia was harboring an al-Q'aeda cell led by two known
terrorists. A more detailed list of known terrorists is offered to Saudi
intelligence in August 2001 and refused. [Source: Financial Times
1/12/01; See No Evil by a book by Robert Baer (release date Feb. 2002).

5. 1998 and 2000 - Former President George H.W. Bush travels to Saudi
Arabia on behalf of the privately owned Carlyle Group, the 11th largest
defense contractor in the U.S. While there he meets privately with the
Saudi royal family and the bin Laden family. [Source: Wall Street
Journal, Sept. 27, 2001. See also FTW, Vol. IV, No 7 - "The Best Enemies
Money Can Buy," - [link] /carlyle.html. ]

6. January, 2001 - The Bush Administration orders the FBI and
intelligence agencies to "back off" investigations involving the bin
Laden family, including two of Osama bin Laden's relatives (Abdullah and
Omar) who were living in Falls Church, VA - right next to CIA
headquarters. This followed previous orders dating back to 1996,
frustrating efforts to investigate the bin Laden family. [Source: BBC
Newsnight, Correspondent Gregg Palast - Nov 7, 2001].

7. Feb 13, 2001 - UPI Terrorism Correspondent Richard Sale - while
covering a trial of bin Laden's Al Q'aeda followers - reports that the
National Security Agency has broken bin Laden's encrypted
communications. Even if this indicates that bin Laden changed systems in
February it does not mesh with the fact that the government insists that
the attacks had been planned for years.

8. May 2001 - Secretary of State Colin Powell gives $43 million in aid
to the Taliban regime, purportedly to assist hungry farmers who are
starving since the destruction of their opium crop in January on orders
of the Taliban regime. [Source: The Los Angeles Times, May 22, 2001].

9. May, 2001 - Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, a career
covert operative and former Navy Seal, travels to India on a publicized
tour while CIA Director George Tenet makes a quiet visit to Pakistan to
meet with Pakistani leader General Pervez Musharraf. Armitage has long
and deep Pakistani intelligence connections and he is the recipient of
the highest civil decoration awarded by Pakistan. It would be reasonable
to assume that while in Islamabad, Tenet, in what was described as "an
unusually long meeting," also met with his Pakistani counterpart, Lt.
General Mahmud Ahmad, head of the ISI. [Source The Indian SAPRA news
agency, May 22, 2001.]

10. June 2001 - German intelligence, the BND, warns the CIA and Israel
that Middle Eastern terrorists are "planning to hijack commercial
aircraft to use as weapons to attack important symbols of American and
Israeli culture." [Source: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, September 14,
2001.]

11. July, 2001 - Three American officials: Tom Simmons (former U.S.
Ambassador to Pakistan), Karl Inderfurth (former Assistant Secretary of
State for South Asian affairs) and Lee Coldren (former State Department
expert on South Asia), meet with Pakistani and Russian intelligence
officers in Berlin and tell them that the U.S. is planning military
strikes against Afghanistan in October. A French book released in
November, "Bin Laden - La Verite´ Interdite," discloses that Taliban
representatives often sat in on the meetings. British papers confirm
that the Pakistani ISI relayed the threats to the Taliban. [Source: The
Guardian, September 22, 2001; the BBC, September 18, 2001.The Inter
Press Service, Nov 16, 2001]

12. Summer 2001 - According to a Sept. 26 story in Britain's The
Guardian, correspondent David Leigh reported that, "U.S. department of
defense official, Dr. Jeffrey Starr, visited Tajikistan in January. The
Guardian's Felicity Lawrence established that US Rangers were also
training special troops in Kyrgyzstan. There were unconfirmed reports
that Tajik and Uzbek special troops were training in Alaska and
Montana."

13. Summer 2001 (est.) - Pakistani ISI Chief General Ahmad (see above)
orders an aide to wire transfer $100,000 to Mohammed Atta, who was
according to the FBI, the lead terrorist in the suicide hijackings.
Ahmad recently resigned after the transfer was disclosed in India and
confirmed by the FBI. [Source: The Times of India, October 11, 2001.]

14. Summer 2001 - An Iranian man phones U.S. law enforcement to warn of
an imminent attack on the World Trade Center in the week of September
9th. German police confirm the calls but state that the U.S. Secret
Service would not reveal any further information. [Source: German news
agency "online.de", September 14, 2001, translation retrieved from
online.ie in Ireland.]

15. June 26, 2001 - The magazine indiareacts.com states that "India and
Iran will 'facilitate' US and Russian plans for 'limited military
action' against the Taliban." The story indicates that the fighting will
be done by US and Russian troops with the help of Tajikistan and
Uzbekistan. [Source: indiareacts.com, June 26, 2001.]

16. August 2001 - The FBI arrests an Islamic militant linked to bin
Laden in Boston. French intelligence sources confirm that the man is a
key member of bin Laden's network and the FBI learns that he has been
taking flying lessons. At the time of his arrest the man is in
possession of technical information on Boeing aircraft and flight
manuals. [Source: Reuters, September 13.]

17. August 11 or 12 - US Navy Lt. Delmart "Mike" Vreeland, jailed in
Toronto on U.S. fraud charges and claiming to be an officer in U.S.
Naval intelligence, writes details of the pending WTC attacks and seals
them in an envelope which he gives to Canadian authorities. [Source: The
Toronto Star, Oct. 23, 2001; Toronto Superior Court Records]

18. Summer 2001 - Russian intelligence notifies the CIA that 25
terrorist pilots have been specifically training for suicide missions.
This is reported in the Russian press and news stories are translated
for FTW by a retired CIA officer.

19. July 4-14, 2001 - Osama bin Laden receives treatments for kidney
disease at the American hospital in Dubai and meets with a CIA official
who returns to CIA headquarters on July 15th. [Source: Le Figaro,
October 31st, 2001.]

20. August 2001 - Russian President Vladimir Putin orders Russian
intelligence to warn the U.S. government "in the strongest possible
terms" of imminent attacks on airports and government buildings.
[Source: MS-NBC interview with Putin, September 15.]

21. August/September, 2001 - The Dow Jones Industrial Average drops
nearly 900 points in the three weeks prior to the attack. A major stock
market crash is imminent.

22. Sept. 3-10, 2001 - MS-NBC reports on September 16 that a caller to a
Cayman Islands radio talk show gave several warnings of an imminent
attack on the U.S. by bin Laden in the week prior to 9/11.

23. September 1-10, 2001 - In an exercise, Operation "Swift Sword"
planned for four years, 23, 000 British troops are steaming toward Oman.
Although the 9/11 attacks caused a hiccup in the deployment the massive
operation was implemented as planned. At the same time two U.S. carrier
battle groups arrive on station in the Gulf of Arabia just off the
Pakistani coast. Also at the same time, some 17,000 U.S. troops join
more than 23,000 NATO troops in Egypt for Operation "Bright Star." All
of these forces are in place before the first plane hits the World Trade
Center. [Sources: The Guardian, CNN, FOX, The Observer, International
Law Professor Francis Boyle, the University of Illinois.]

24. September 7, 2001 - Florida Governor Jeb Bush signs a two-year
emergency executive order (01-261) making new provisions for the Florida
National Guard to assist law enforcement and emergency-management
personnel in the event of large civil disturbances, disaster or acts of
terrorism. [Source: State of Florida web site listing of Governor's
Executive Orders.]

25. September 6-7, 2001 - 4,744 put options (a speculation that the
stock will go down) are purchased on United Air Lines stock as opposed
to only 396 call options (speculation that the stock will go up). This
is a dramatic and abnormal increase in sales of put options. Many of the
UAL puts are purchased through Deutschebank/AB Brown, a firm managed
until 1998 by the current Executive Director of the CIA, A.B. "Buzzy"
Krongard. [Source: The Herzliyya International Policy Institute for
Counterterrorism, [link], September 21; The New York
Times; The Wall Street Journal.]

26. September 10, 2001 - 4,516 put options are purchased on American
Airlines as compared to 748 call options. [Source: ICT - above]

27. September 6-11, 2001 - No other airlines show any similar trading
patterns to those experienced by UAL and American. The put option
purchases on both airlines were 600% above normal. This at a time when
Reuters (September 10) issues a business report stating, "Airline stocks
may be poised to take off."

28. September 6-10, 2001 - Highly abnormal levels of put options are
purchased in Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, AXA Re(insurance) which owns
25% of American Airlines, and Munich Re. All of these companies are
directly impacted by the September 11 attacks. [Source: ICT, above; FTW,
Vol. IV, No.7, October 18, 2001, [link]
oct152001.html. ]

29. It has been documented that the CIA, the Israeli Mossad and many
other intelligence agencies monitor stock trading in real time using
highly advanced programs reported to be descended from Promis software.
This is to alert national intelligence services of just such kinds of
attacks. Promis was reported, as recently as June, 2001 to be in Osama
bin Laden's possession and, as a result of recent stories by FOX, both
the FBI and the Justice Department have confirmed its use for U.S.
intelligence gathering through at least this summer. This would confirm
that CIA had additional advance warning of imminent attacks. [Sources:
The Washington Times, June 15, 2001; FOX News, October 16, 2001; FTW,
October 26, 2001, - [link] magic_carpet.html;
FTW, Vol. IV, No.6, Sept. 18, 2001 - [link]
sept1801.html; FTW, Vol. 3, No 7, 9/30/00 - www.copvcia.com/stories/
may_2001/052401_promis.html.

30. September 11, 2001 - Gen Mahmud of the ISI (see above), friend of
Mohammed Atta, is visiting Washington on behalf of the Taliban. [Source:
MS-NBC, Oct. 7.]

31. September 11, 2001 - Employees of Odigo, Inc. in Israel, one of the
world's largest instant messaging companies, with offices in New York,
receive threat warnin More >