 |
New Civilization News: Memebusting: Pronoia, Epinoia, Paranoia, Morphonoia |
Category: Communication 7 comments
10 Sep 2007 @ 07:54 by Merlin Silk @76.168.217.251 : wikipedia editor 10 Sep 2007 @ 13:31 by mx @201.26.164.235 : true..but... it would require some fighting.. the sad part is that it is there as it is... and, ah, paranoia in Wikipedia now has a direct link to 'conspiracy. Meaning that who is suspecting any kind of conspiracy 'has paranoia' as an illness and needs 'treatment'... bravo !! As if, after thousand of years of humans conspiring against other humans, all of a sudden in 2007 they would have stopped doing so... But, of course, in their definition I have paranoia, that's too funny... 11 Sep 2007 @ 18:54 by solomoreno : Understanding improper identifications It's interesting how the term paranoia, originally connoting something holy and divine, has come to be equivocated with madness. I remember you writing somewhere that somewhat of the same thing had happened to the word "chaos." These improper identifications seem to have much to do with the tendency to equivocate spiritual experiences and madness. I don't yet have the clearest view of the connection between the two, but I do see one there. Perhaps because at some point the Top is the Bottom and the Bottom is the Top? In any case, psychiatrists and psychologists don't seem to have the ability to confront either. You frequently discuss memes. Do you mind providing a definition for the term? 11 Sep 2007 @ 21:07 by mx @201.1.51.65 : meme definition: a good one is at [link] 12 Sep 2007 @ 02:13 by solomoreno : To my credit... I did already check there but I wanted to make sure you were basing your ideas upon the same basic definition. In any case, thank you for the link. 13 Sep 2007 @ 14:47 by nraye : Non sacred Geometry Interesting thought, amongst other good insights. Which altogether indicate the importance of the Classics, Latin and Greek and Hebrew for that matter, in their being an anchor the meaning of the sum total of their texts, and commentaries through the ages, underpinning or discussing their meaning. Whilst Wiki may stray here and there, we KNOW. And to my name sake above who seems wiser that his years, a meme from my own point of view is the extreme opposite of what happens in Classical texts. It is extreme Modernism, beyond Fractual, Nano, Deconstructivist, it is the anti Christ of Modernity actually, dragging it down to the depths of Hades. BECAUSE someone else can never never actually get into the head of the other and know how and why they took to a certain idea in such way. It is the baloney of baloney. The Final Joke of our society, my advice would be to forget the word and ignore, could be called too "meaningless complexity" completely for its own sake by people who cannot grasp any idea of their own to form an anchor for their beliefs. The inventor of the term Meme, by definition, if I am correct, PRECISELY had no BELIEFS. None. Can we envision this? yes, aka Society Amok, totally. A form of non sacred geometry because, it begets nothing in its existence, but totally deconstructs, as in nuclear. Like designing a building which will fall down immediately when the last piece is added. Non sacred geometry. A square is a form of non sacred geometry, but it is held together by opposing forces in stasis and therefore it gains its phenomenal strength and can be used as a building block into another realm of existence. A square is inert non sacred geomentry. Very interesting concepts here, Condor. 30 Oct 2007 @ 17:35 by mortimer @68.209.134.124 : just to funny nraye, on good day i probably can look inside your head and know how and why you took to a certain idea in such way. example; you seem to feel guilt that you had no beliefs when you ran amok. perhaps you should start with some doubt, skip belief, and get some certainty. max, is somebody paranoid that you are paranoid? bah ha ha, thats just to funny! oh yeah, and cyrus scofield is the anti-christ Other entries in Communication 20 Apr 2008 @ 10:57: How we unconsciously resist becoming enlightened, and what to do about it! 8 Apr 2008 @ 06:31: An open Dialogue on the Nature of Reality. 22 Feb 2008 @ 16:36: Blogging or Logging 9 Jan 2008 @ 22:45: A Communication Model 26 Oct 2007 @ 08:09: Humanities new “Canon” ?? - a new German Bildungskanon ?? 31 Jul 2007 @ 18:07: Humanity Sucks! 10 Jun 2007 @ 13:10: Microblogging and Dialogue 2 Apr 2007 @ 21:10: Being consistent 8 Aug 2006 @ 05:40: Announcing new forum: LOVE OURSELVES ISLAND 14 Jul 2006 @ 02:12: Response to Heiner Benking's "Dialogues and Conversations" paper
|
10 Sep 2007 @ 02:45, by Max Sandor