| Naked States - not lewd but indeed lurid!|
|19 Dec 2002 @ 14:26, by Julie Solheim-Roe|
Ming said yesterday
"I was watching a documentary on HBO about this artist Spencer Tunick who has been traveling America and the world, photographing nude people in unusual settings and arrangements. Now, what was very refreshing and inspiring about that is that there is nothing lewd or even tintilating about how he does it. It is very normal people, not picked based on any standard of physical beauty, but mainly based on that they're real people that one meets on the street. And there is something very powerful and beautiful that comes from that. Besides being art, and performance art, it is activism. It is activism asking us to look at things a bit differently, and breaking through stupid bourgeois norms for what is proper and expected."
I remember watching a documentary about Tunick's work on the ITV last year in the U.K. I would agree that it is very refreshing and radical. That this might indeed be the kind of answer we need to get out and DO: Yes! All size and shapes of nudes for peace, nudes for exposure, nudes for some sort of message and Truth with a capital T.
But I wouldn't say this is NOT lewd and tintilating, only in that we denounce being lewd and tintilating for it's own sake. What is lewd? What is tintilating? When it is cut off from the rest of us, then it is crass and lewd. But do you think this art is NOT erotic? I think it includes being erotic by it's Nature. By not seeming to be about the flesh, but by using the flesh, it becomes even MORE about the flesh... about the flesh we hide and deny. But then the perversions is that there is a lewd and lurid obsession with flesh that 'acts out' the parts of us that have been hidden. Tunick is lurid in that he is vivid. He is NOT obscene in that he IS obscene beyond obscenity. To say he is NOT what he IS, is the transcendence of when things are healing on many levels, dealing with where we are split apart whilst we become whole again just to split ourselves up for the sake of it.
The settings in which his nudes appear in to me are very exciting and arousing because they embody where we are so split from Nature, and thus, bringing the Nude Nature into the setting, is like some pledge from purgatory that is pleading us back into some purpose and inclusive reality. Therefore it's existential and idealistic at once. I am always for radical expressions that include the beauty and bizarre of our human pain and pleasure.
Category: Visual Arts, Graphics
20 Dec 2002 @ 00:49 by : Delightful
So happy you have decided to start up a Log, jewel. Perhaps it is not the first time, for I think you have been around NCN for some time. And I'm glad to be reminded of my love for pomegranates too! Think I'll buy a couple today.
20 Dec 2002 @ 03:51 by shawa : Hello! :-)--,--´---@
...Nice to have you on board the Newslogs! Have a very nice X-mas Season! (Or is it Samhain? ...) - Bright Blessings from Spain, :-)
20 Dec 2002 @ 05:19 by jstarrs : Thanks for the log....
...keep them coming!
20 Dec 2002 @ 06:10 by spiritseek : Honesty
Honesty in all forms can not be wrong. Delighted to meet you, Marie
20 Dec 2002 @ 08:13 by : That's good...
From someone who is not too terribly experienced in the visual arts (me), I think you have a very interesting perspective. It is a crazy picture... pulls my attention in all directions at the same time, when I really look at it. Welcome to the news logs Jewel.
Other entries in Visual Arts, Graphics
28 Mar 2010 @ 14:20: Great Minds Think Alike
28 Mar 2010 @ 10:28: The Symbolism of The Circle
31 Dec 2008 @ 14:48: HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE
28 Dec 2008 @ 10:10: Poster 4
17 Dec 2008 @ 23:44: Make your own sign ;-)
1 Nov 2008 @ 22:32: Dawn-Usha
23 Oct 2008 @ 00:05: We Are The New Civilization
10 Aug 2008 @ 18:52: Touched by his Noodly Appendage
28 Mar 2007 @ 07:27: Photography as art
27 Jul 2006 @ 10:34: Is it poetry?